LIEB BLOG

Legal Analysts

Tuesday, January 30, 2024

New Rule Targets Salary History to Close Gender and Racial Pay Gaps

The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) has taken a significant step towards addressing gender and racial pay disparities within the Federal workforce with its latest regulation. Effective April 1, 2024, this rule prohibits the use of salary history in setting pay for new civilian employees, a practice that has historically contributed to ongoing pay inequities.

The private sector should take notice because the use of pay history is going to be a driving force in future claims under the Equal Pay Act based upon extrapolations from this regulation. 

Salary history has often been a determining factor in pay decisions, but this approach fails to account for the diverse experiences and qualifications individuals bring to their roles. More critically, it has perpetuated biases, inadvertently anchoring new salaries to previous ones that may have been influenced by discrimination. This cycle has been particularly detrimental to women and people of color, who statistically earn less than their white male counterparts. The gap is even more pronounced for women of color, underscoring the urgency of implementing measures that promote fair compensation.

By mandating that Federal agencies set pay based on merit, qualifications, and the requirements of the position rather than past compensation, the OPM aims to dismantle one of the barriers to achieving pay equity. This rule is a bold move towards creating a more equitable and inclusive Federal workforce, where pay disparities no longer shadow one's career.

For an in-depth understanding of the OPM's final rule and its impact on pay equity, visit the Federal Register: Advancing Pay Equity in Governmentwide Pay Systems.



Monday, January 29, 2024

Emergency Ready: New Requirement for Property Management Companies

On January 26, 2024, Governor Hochul signed Bill No. A08494 to amend the multiple residence and dwelling law in New York State. Now, owners and agents of multiple residences and multiple dwellings need to provide emergency personnel a list of names and contact information of residents on lease execution, lease renewal, lease amendment, and now, on annual recertification if an owner is a public corporation regulated by the public housing law. 


The underlying law is important so first responders know that everyone is safe that should be in the housing in events like fires. However, the most vulnerable residents in these situations are often the ones without voices for themselves who are relegated to living in public housing. This new amendment is specific to them and applies the law of providing occupant lists to first responders for residents in housing owned by a public corporation under the public housing law. 


The amendment to the multiple residence and dwelling laws goes into effect on February 15, 2024. To learn more and read bill A08494, click here. How do you envision this impacting community safety? Let us know your thoughts below.






Friday, January 26, 2024

Navigating the New Federal and NYS Reporting Mandates for Corporate Entities with Lieb at Law | Beneficial Ownership Information Filings

There is a NEW reporting requirement for business owners in 2024. 


Beneficial Ownership Information Filings

The landscape of corporate transparency in the United States has undergone significant changes with the introduction of the federal Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) in 2021, which will go hand-in-hand with specific reporting requirements set forth by New York State (NYS).  Lieb at Law is committed to guiding your business through both these mandates, ensuring full compliance without the hassle.


Federal Reporting Requirements: The Corporate Transparency Act

The CTA, a bipartisan effort aimed at combating financial crimes, mandates certain businesses to report beneficial ownership information to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN).


Who Must Comply?

  • Domestic Reporting Companies: Corporations, LLCs, or similar entities formed by filing with a secretary of state or comparable office within any U.S. state or tribal jurisdiction.
  • Foreign Reporting Companies: Entities formed under foreign laws but registered to do business in the U.S. through a similar filing process.

Key Deadlines:

  • Pre-2024 Entities: Companies established or registered before January 1, 2024, must submit their initial report by January 1, 2025.
  • Entities Formed or Registered in 2024: Must file within 90 days of registration or official notification.
  • Post-2024 Entities: Have 30 days from notification to file their initial report.


New York State Reporting Requirements

In addition to federal mandates, NYS has set its own reporting requirements for corporate entities to further enhance transparency and combat illicit financial activities within the state. NYS's reporting requirements go into effect at the end of 2024. To learn more click here to read our blog post. 


Who Is Affected?

  • All entities required to comply with the federal CTA. 
  • In December of 2024, entities operating within NYS must also adhere to state-specific reporting requirements.

State-Specific Mandates Will Include:

  • Additional details on beneficial ownership might be required, aligning with or expanding upon federal mandates.
  • Reporting frequencies, deadlines, and procedures specific to NYS, which may differ from federal requirements.

How Lieb at Law Can Assist:

The intricacies of adhering to both federal and state reporting mandates can be daunting. The team at Lieb at Law understands the nuances of both federal and NYS mandates. We will help your business submit reports accurately to both FinCEN and NYS authorities. Reach out today to secure your peace of mind in this new era of corporate transparency. Click here for more information or email info@liebatlaw.com





*Attorney Advertising

Thursday, January 25, 2024

Challenging Discrimination: The Fight for Pride Flag Rights in Schools

Connetquot's targeting LGBTQ+ teachers and students in creating a hostile environment must end, but even worse, Connetquot, as a part of the government, must respect its teacher's freedom of symbolic speech by letting them personalize the walls and doors of their classrooms, as SCOTUS recognized emphatically in Tinker v. Des Moines. We cannot let government intrude on our Bill of Rights by engaging in viewpoint discrimination. Full article about the case Lieb at Law is representing featured in Newsday https://www.newsday.com/long-island/education/connetquot-schools-pride-flag-lawsuit-h4xq59ol




Monday, January 22, 2024

Navigating Education Discrimination Law - A National CLE Instructed by Attorney Andrew Lieb

Lieb at Law, P.C. has partnered with Law Practice CLE to offer a pivotal Continuing Legal Education (CLE) course, "Education Discrimination: Perez v. Sturgis Public Schools," led by Attorney Andrew Lieb.

The Changing Dynamics of Education Law
Education Law is constantly evolving, with recent Supreme Court rulings significantly affecting the landscape, especially regarding the rights of disabled students. This course is designed to provide legal professionals with a comprehensive understanding of these changes and the skills needed to navigate them effectively.

Insights from the Course
In this 2-hour online session, Andrew Lieb will dissect the nuances of key cases such as Cummings v. Premier Rehab Keller and Perez v. Sturgis Public Schools. Participants will learn strategic approaches for handling education discrimination cases, including litigation, due process hearings, and settlement negotiations.

Benefits of the Course
Participants will gain:
  • A deeper understanding of recent developments in Discrimination Law.
  • Practical strategies for managing complex education discrimination cases.
  • Enhanced advocacy skills for representing disabled students in schools.

Who Should Enroll
This CLE course is essential for:
  • Lawyers focusing on Education Law and disability rights.
  • Legal professionals seeking updated knowledge on education law trends.
  • Advocates and educators interested in the legal dimensions of education.
Join Us on 1/31/24 (and available online)

For registration and more information, please visit Law Practice CLE - Education Discrimination: Perez v. Sturgis Public Schools




Tuesday, January 16, 2024

Fed DOL Implements Multifactor Analysis for Worker Classification as Employee v. Independent Contractor

The Department of Labor (DOL) announced that on March 11, 2024, a new rule, 89 FR 1638, will go into effect restoring the multifactor analysis used by courts for decades in determining if an individual is an employee or Independent Contractor (IC) under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). 


Misclassifying workers as ICs rather than employees can result in wage claims with liquidated damages and attorneys' fees under the FLSA, which can be catastrophic for business to continue to exist. Simply, you have to get it right and ICs that are misclassified have excellent cases because liquidated damages are two (2) times the amount not received. 


This new rule is being announced because DOL had concerns about the 2021 IC Rule where it did not fully align with the FLSA's text and purpose. 


The six factors under the New Rule are:

  1. Opportunity for profit or loss
  2. Financial stake and nature of resources invested in the work
  3. Degree of permanence of the work relationship
  4. Degree of control the employer has over the person’s work
  5. Whether the work is essential to the employer’s business
  6. Worker’s skill and initiative


This new rule provides a consistent approach for conducting business with ICs and employes. 

You can read the Department of Labor's release on this new law here. You can read the final rule here



Friday, January 12, 2024

Enhancing Transparency: New Law on Disclosure of LLC Beneficial Owners

On December 22, 2023 Governor Hochul signed Bill A3484A amending New York State's limited liability company law and the executive law. This new amendment will significantly transform the landscape of limited liability companies (LLCs) in New York. How will this bill accomplish this? By eradicating anonymous ownership of LLCs. 


This amendment defines beneficial ownership while also mandating the disclosure of beneficial owners upon the formation of an LLC, and publicizing this information in New York State's business entity database. 


This change to the law stems from concerns about the repercussions of anonymous corporate ownership. It highlights the misuse of anonymous LLCs for various illicit activities, including tax evasion, funding criminal organizations, money laundering, and even hindering routine code enforcement.


This legislative move aligns New York State with global efforts to foster transparency in corporate ownership. By mandating disclosure and establishing a public database, this change to the law aims to curtail illicit activities associated with anonymous ownership while protecting genuine privacy concerns through specific exemptions and waivers.


The transparency this law brings will save time, money, and resources for those suing an LLC. This will reduce unnecessary motion practices and other additional steps that had been required in order to determine who to serve when suing an LLC. 


This bill stands as a significant step towards a more transparent and accountable business landscape in New York State.


This law comes into effect on December 21, 2024, 365 days after being signed by the Governor. To learn more about Bill A3484A , click here


Understanding the Justice Department's Proposed Rule on Accessible Medical Diagnostic Equipment for Disability Non-Discrimination

On 1/12/24, the Justice Department announced a proposed rule revision under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), targeting the accessibility of Medical Diagnostic Equipment (MDE) in state and local government entities. This move is a significant step towards ensuring that medical diagnostic equipment is accessible to all, regardless of disability. 

The rule, proposed by the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice, seeks to amend title II of the ADA regulations. The primary goal is to establish explicit requirements, including technical standards, for accessible MDE provided by state and local governments. 

Key Provisions:

  • Adoption of Standards: The rule proposes adopting standards set by the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board for MDE.
  • Scoping Requirements: Specifics on the amount and type of accessible MDE required.
  • Deadline for Comments: Stakeholders can submit comments until February 12, 2024, primarily through the electronic Federal Docket Management System.


Impact on Medical Services: The lack of accessible MDE has been a barrier for people with disabilities, often leading to compromised health care. For instance, patients with disabilities have faced challenges in accessing routine examinations like mammograms and Pap smears due to inaccessibility. This rule aims to rectify such disparities.


Public Participation: The Justice Department encourages public involvement in the rulemaking process. Comments can be submitted electronically or via mail. It's an opportunity for healthcare providers, individuals with disabilities, and other stakeholders to voice their opinions and concerns.


Implications for State and Local Governments: Entities offering medical services will need to align with these standards, ensuring that their MDE is accessible. This might involve acquiring new equipment or modifying existing setups.


Economic and Environmental Considerations: The Department invites comments on potential economic and environmental impacts of the rule. This consideration is crucial for balanced and sustainable implementation.






Wednesday, January 03, 2024

Costly Consequences: How Recent Sexual Harassment Settlements Highlight the Financial Risks for Employers

NYS mandates that every employer to provide each employee with annual sexual harassment prevention training, as required by Labor Law §201-g, and in NYC by Local Law §96. Non-compliance not only risks severe statutory penalties and potential misdemeanor charges by the government, but also exposes your organization to substantial financial judgments in cases of workplace discrimination lawsuits.


Recent settlements in sexual harassment cases illustrate the potential financial impacts:

  1. Chopourian v. Catholic Healthcare West: $168 million settlement. (Source: Zuckerman Law)
  2. Sanders v. Madison Square Garden: $11.6 million settlement. (Source: Zuckerman Law)
  3. USA Gymnastics v. Larry Nassar: $380 million settlement. (Source: eratics.com)
  4. McDonald’s: $2 million settlement. (Source: EEOC)
  5. SAVA Senior Care: $150k settlement. (Source: EEOC)
  6. Chipotle: $400k settlement. (Source: EEOC)
  7. Burger King: $60k settlement. (Source: EEOC)
  8. D.C. Dept of Corrections: $8 million settlement. (Source: eratics.com)
  9. Columbia University: $100 million settlement. (Source: New York Times)
  10.  "F.M." v. Dept of Children and Family Services of LA County: $45.4 million jury award. (Source: Taylor Ring)


To mitigate your exposure, Lieb Compliance offers interdisciplinary sexual harassment prevention training. Our program is a blend of insights from social sciences and legal perspectives, ensuring comprehensive understanding and compliance. We feature engaging star presenters adept at managing sensitive topics, providing an interactive and thought-provoking experience.


Our training is available on-demand, includes a fully-developed complaint procedure, and is backed by an administration system to track compliance. This comprehensive approach ensures that your organization not only meets legal requirements but also fosters a respectful and safe workplace environment.


Don't risk non-compliance. Enroll in Lieb Compliance's NY Sexual Harassment Training today.


For more information, visit https://www.sexualharassmenttrainingny.com



Wednesday, December 27, 2023

No More Non-Competes VETOED

On December 22, 2023 Governor Hochul vetoed Bill A01278. This bill would have fundamentally altered New York State's Labor Law by prohibiting non-compete agreements and additional restrictive covenants in labor and employment contracts.


This bill would have addressed the usage of non-compete agreements in employment contracts. It defined critical terms and highlighted that employers, their representatives, or officers of corporations could not solicit, demand, or accept a non-compete agreement from a covered individual. However, it didn't prohibit employers from entering into agreements that protected trade secrets, client information, or client solicitation. 


The justification behind this legislation was grounded in the adverse impact of non-compete agreements on New York's labor market and economy. These agreements purportedly curtailed workers’ mobility, limiting their ability to explore better employment opportunities and potentially stifling competitive wages and benefits.


The federal government has shown interest in a nationwide ban on non-compete agreements. New York could have lead the charge in fostering a more open and competitive labor market by codifying this ban into state law. 


Now, non-competes live on and companies hiring those with non-competes should be worried about tortious interference with a contract claims being levied against them. 


To learn more about Bill A01278, click here. 




Tuesday, December 19, 2023

Newsmax: Attorney Andrew Lieb Debates New Texas Immigration Law

Attorney Andrew Lieb appears on Newsmax to debate the legality of Texas' new law authorizing the state's police to arrest migrants entering the country illegally. Lieb argues in favor of the law, stating it is within Texas' rights to enforce illegal entry into the state based on how this law differs from the precedent in Arizona v. US (plus, different makeup of the court). 




Tuesday, December 12, 2023

NewsNation: Employment Attorney Andrew Lieb Discusses Proposed Laws Against Fat Discrimination

Attorney Andrew Lieb appears on NewsNation to talk about potential legislation prohibiting discrimination based on weight or obesity. He discusses the potential enforcement of laws against 'weight discrimination' and their implications for employers, including the consideration of obesity as a protected category akin to race or religion in anti-discrimination laws. 


In the discussion, Lieb tackles employers' worries, such as the possibility of a gym or health-centric business being unable to hire someone who doesn't align with their brand ethos. He delves into the intricate legal aspects and underscores the importance of fostering an inclusive work environment, steering clear of shaming individuals.




Monday, December 11, 2023

Scripps News: Lieb Explaining Workplace Age Discrimination Laws and the Deadspin Article Controversy

Discrimination Attorney Andrew Lieb explains the challenges of proving age discrimination claims under The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 and current efforts in Congress to lower the bar. 


He also discusses whether the parents of a 9-year old Kansas City Chiefs fan have a legal case against Deadspin for portraying him as having blackface in an article where they targeted him for face paint and wearing a headdress.




Monday, December 04, 2023

Newsmax: Attorney Andrew Lieb Talks About Judge Rejecting Texas Bid To Stop Agents Cutting Border Razor Wire

Attorney Andrew Lieb joins The National Report Court on Newsmax TV to debate a recent court ruling in which a federal judge rejected Texas' bid to stop federal agents from cutting razor wire that Texas had installed along the U.S.-Mexico border. Andrew Lieb debates whether Texas has the legal authority to sue the federal government over its border security policies by citing the need for sovereign immunity in order for the US Government to function.




Friday, December 01, 2023

Equality in Health Law: NYS Bill for LGBTQ+ & HIV Protection Against Discrimination

On November 30, 2023, Governor Hochul signed A0372A establishing a new section of the Public Health Law, Section 2803-c-2. 


This new addition to the Public Health Law combined with Executive Law 296 creates express discriminatory events that are actionable. 


The new Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and People Living with HIV Long Term Care Bill of Rights provides that it is unlawful for a long-term care facility or facility staff member to discriminate against any resident on the basis of such resident's actual or perceived sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) status. 


Under this new addition facilities are required to post notices about their nondiscrimination policies with information about reporting violations, employ procedures for recordkeeping purposes that include residents' gender identity, correct name as indicated by the resident, preferred pronoun as indicated by the resident, protect personally identifiable information regarding residents' sexual orientation and more. 


Facilities are also now required to ensure that facility staff that are not involved in providing direct care to residents are not present during physical examinations or the provision of personal care without the express permission of the resident or the resident's legally authorized representative and ensure that at least once every two years, each facility staff member who works directly with residents receives training on cultural competency focusing on patients who identify as LGBT and/or HIV.


If a facility  discriminates against an individual protected by Section 2803-c-2, that discriminatory conduct may be actionable under the New York State Human Rights Law. 



 

Thursday, November 30, 2023

FOX 5 NY: Attorney Andrew Lieb Talks About NYC Mayor Eric Adams Being Accused Of Sexual Assault

This Interview on FOX 5 NY discusses a lawsuit filed against New York City Mayor Eric Adams accusing him of sexually assaulting a woman in 1993 while they both worked for the city. Attorney Andrew Lieb provides context on the legal process, explaining that the initial filing only included a summons with notice to meet the deadline under the Adult Survivors Act, which is now expired - but, this case also involves the NYC Gender Motivated Violence Act, which extends the statute of limitations on old cases, like this, until March 1, 2025. 



Lieb at Law Represents Class Action Hearing Impair Tenants in Landmark NYC Disability Discrimination Case

In a significant development in a case that underscores the ongoing challenges faced by individuals with disabilities in accessing suitable housing, Lieb at Law is representing a hearing-impaired tenant in a discrimination lawsuit against the City of New York and other entities. The case, as reported by Law360, highlights crucial issues regarding the responsibilities of property owners and the rights of tenants with disabilities.

Background of the Case

Elewood Torres, the plaintiff, filed a class-action lawsuit in 2022, challenging the failure of his Lower Manhattan apartment building's owners to provide necessary services for tenants with hearing disabilities. Despite the building at 174-184 Forsyth St. being funded to provide accessible housing, critical safety improvements have been lacking.

Key Issues at Stake

The lawsuit points to the absence of essential features such as video cameras in elevators, smoke alarms with strobe lights and bed shakers, and security staff proficient in American Sign Language. These deficiencies not only violate the Americans With Disabilities Act, and the NYS / NYC Human Rights Laws, but also pose a significant risk to the safety and well-being of the residents.

The City's Position and Plaintiff's Response

The city contends that it no longer owns the property and that the ADA does not apply to private residential complexes. However, Torres disputes this claim, highlighting that the ownership of the building reverted to the city due to breaches in the sale agreements. This aspect is crucial in determining the applicability of the ADA and the city's responsibilities.

Lieb at Law's Stance

Representing Torres, Lieb at Law's Associate Attorney, Richard Hermer-Fried, emphasized the gravity of the situation: "To this day, defendants have not provided bed rockers to wake tenants in case of a fire. It's utterly egregious that nothing's been done to protect these individuals." The firm's commitment to advocating for the rights of individuals with disabilities is evident in its vigorous pursuit of this case.

What's Next in the Case

With a preliminary injunction requested by Torres to compel the defendants to install the necessary improvements, and the court ordering documentation of such improvements, the case is poised for critical developments. Lieb at Law remains steadfast in its pursuit of justice for Elewood Torres and other similarly situated tenants.




*Attorney Advertising

Tuesday, November 28, 2023

NY Has a New Law Protecting Freelancers (independent contractors)

Governor Hochul enacted significant legislation this week marking a pivotal moment for freelancer workers across New York State by signing BillA06040, known as the "Freelance Isn't Free Act".


Before the introduction of this law (Labor Law 191-d), problems for freelancers included:


  1. Delayed or Non-Payment: Without legal mandates, there was little to no consequence for payment terms leaving freelancers financially vulnerable.
  2. Lack of Written Contracts: Many freelance engagements proceeded without formal written contracts, leading to misunderstandings and disputes about work scope, payment terms, deadlines, and other essential aspects of the work arrangement.
  3. Limited Recourse for Contract Violations: Prior to this law, there was no straightforward legal recourse if an agreement was violated. Pursuing legal action was often costly and time-consuming, making it an impractical option.
  4. Absence of Standardized Contract Terms: With no standardization of contract terms, freelancers often agreed to unfair or exploitative conditions due to lack of industry standards or fear of losing work.
  5. Retaliation: Freelancers often hesitated to assert their rights or demand fair treatment due to the fear of being blacklisted or losing future work opportunities
  6. Administrative Burdens: Freelancers were often burdened with the responsibility of chasing payments and resolving disputes on their own

The goal of the Freelance Isn't Free Act law is to ensure that all laborers get the right to fair and timely pay. Freelancers who are denied rights can claim liquidated damages plus attorneys fees making it easier to pursue a claim against the hiring party (previously, the economics of a lawsuit often effectively eliminated the option for freelancers to enforce their rights to get paid; now that is changed). 




Monday, November 27, 2023

Newsmax: Attorney Andrew Lieb Talks About Sony Facing An $8B Lawsuit For Overcharging Playstation Customers.

National Report court is back in session on Newsmax to discuss a $7.9 billion lawsuit against Sony over claims that the PlayStation maker abused its dominant position in the gaming console market, leading to unfair prices for customers. Attorney Andrew Lieb argues the case on behalf of PlayStation customers.



Statewide 'Freelance Isn't Free Act' Enacted - Real Estate Brokers, Pay Attention

On November 22, 2023 Governor Hochul signed Bill A06040 into law thereby creating Labor Law 191-d, the "freelance isn't free act." 


This law will replicate, in large part, the labor rights of freelance workers in NYC throughout state. The Governor's statement on the Bill can be found here


This new law defines which Freelance Workers are protected and then requires that Hiring Parties provide timely payments, a right to a written contract with specific terms, a private right action for violations, a right to no retaliation, a public awareness outreach campaign, a reporting requirement and more. In lawsuits buy Freelance Workers, freelancers who are denied rights can claim liquidated damages plus attorneys fees. 


NYS DOL will provide model contracts as well as a non-judicial, administrative process for resolving disputes between Hiring Parties and Freelance Workers.


The goal of this new law is to ensure that all laborers get the right to fair and timely pay.