LIEB BLOG

Legal Analysts

Monday, April 01, 2019

New Sexual Harassment Law Alert - NYC Employers Must Annually Train Independent Contractors Effective 4/1/19

On 4/1/19 a brand new NYC law requires employers to annually train all employees and independent contractors and have a compliance protocol in place. Andrew Lieb, Esq. and Mordy Yankovich Esq share the news and explain the requirements.


Friday, March 29, 2019

Real Estate Attorneys Don't Work For Brokers

The transactional real estate attorney works for the buyer or seller and NOT for the real estate broker who referred the deal. Now, attorneys are ethically prohibited from providing a copy of the contract of sale to the referring broker as a matter of course. Instead, attorneys may only provide the broker with a copy of the contract of sale after obtaining informed consent from their client.

Read the full article by Andrew Lieb, Esq. published in the Suffolk Lawyer here.


Misclassification of Employees as Independent Contractors: A Costly Mistake

Misclassifying an employee as an independent contractor can be devastating to an employer.

Employers can potentially be liable for back wages, overtime pay, liquidated damages, attorneys' fees and additional penalties for failure to withhold applicable taxes, pay workers compensation and unemployment insurance.

Learn what happens when employers self-classify workers as independent contractors and issue them a 1099.

Review full article by Mordy Yankovich, Esq. published in The Suffolk Lawyer here.


Tuesday, March 26, 2019

Employers & Business Owners with Independent Contractors - Learn What to do with a Payroll Audit

Andrew Lieb, Esq. and Mordy Yankovich Esq. explain the line between an independent contractor and an employee and what happens when you get it wrong. Employers, learn when to get an Attorney involved when facing a payroll audit. Advising a CPA is just not enough. Learn your exposure.


Monday, March 18, 2019

Employers With Independent Contractors - What You Need To Know About The New Law Requiring Sexual Harassment Prevention Training

Andrew Lieb, Esq. and Mordy Yankovich, Esq. clarify what employers need to know about the new NYS and NYC laws requiring sexual harassment prevention training.

Watch this clip and learn about your responsibilities and exposure.




Wednesday, February 27, 2019

Employers - Watch out for Sexual Harassment Training Vendors Claiming to Be Compliant When They Are Not - Here is What You Need To Know

Employers who are seeking to purchase sexual harassment prevention training and policies in compliance with the new New York State and New York City sexual harassment laws must be mindful that some vendors are offering trainings that are not compliant with the new laws.

The New York State law (Section 201-g of the N.Y. Labor Law), which took effect on October 9, 2018, requires that all employers issue a sexual harassment prevention policy that meet minimum requirements including but not limited to establishing a procedure, specifically tailored to each individual employer, for timely investigation of all complaints and issuing a complaint form. 

Therefore - if a company is claiming they can offer a uniform training for any employee to take - be mindful that employers must have a sexual harassment prevention policy and complaint form that specifically shows the employee how to make a complaint and whom to make a complaint to and the information must be including in the training. In the NYS model training, it states: "The training should detail any internal process employees are encouraged to use to complain and include the contact information for the specific name(s) and office(s) with which employees alleging harassment should file their complaints."

The NYS law also requires annual training for all employees (and training for new employees within a reasonable time after hiring). The training must be interactive and must include; 1) an explanation of sexual harassment consistent with guidance issued by the Department of Labor; 2) examples of conduct that constitute unlawful harassment; 3) information regarding the specific state and federal statutory provision concerning sexual harassment and the remedies available to victims of sexual harassment; 4) information regarding employees' rights of redress and remedies available to victims; 5) information regarding conduct responsibilities of supervisors.

The New York City law (Local Law 96), effective April 1, 2019, requires employers with fifteen (15) or more employees to conduct annual training which must be interactive and must include, among other requirements, the employer's specific process for addressing sexual harassment complaints, information concerning bystander intervention and the specific responsibilities of managers and supervisors to address complaints of harassment. In addition, the NYC law requires that employers obtained signed acknowledgment from employees that they attended the training.

While not required, policies and trainings should also address other forms of harassment and discrimination (i.e. race and age), to minimize exposure to potential lawsuits against the employer.

It is imperative that employers choose a vendor who is offering trainings and policies in strict compliance to these new laws to avoid unnecessary penalties and exposure to lawsuits.

Lieb Compliance offers a fully compliant training package including a compliant sexual harassment prevention policy, complaint form and interactive training.



Wednesday, February 20, 2019

Top 10 Real Estate Laws of 2018

Now that 2019 is here it is important to be aware of the changes in the law for our industry. This is not a list about the best events from 2018, but, instead, a list that highlights the new legal landscape that you face as real estate attorneys in 2019. Being familiar with these laws, cases and rules may help you to better address your client’s goals and to make you money while helping you to avoid malpractice.

Read the full article by Andrew Lieb, Esq. published in The Suffolk Lawyer here.


Top 5 Labor and Employment Laws of 2018

As we begin 2019, it is important to reflect on the major legal developments in the field of labor and employment law from 2018 with an eye towards how these developments may change the legal landscape in 2019 and beyond. Attorneys should be aware of these laws and opinions in order to assist clients in ensuring compliance.

Read the Top 5 Labor and Employment Laws of 2018 by Mordy Yankovich, Esq. published in The Suffolk Lawyer here.


Monday, February 18, 2019

Listing to Closing: Steps in a Real Estate Transaction

Buying and selling real estate is both fun and frustrating. The process seems simple but takes forever. The terminology sounds familiar but is misunderstood. All too often buyers and sellers feel hoodwinked by a shyster, but that is far from what is occurring. The truth is that real estate closings are really complicated and that is why the State of New York makes it a felony for anyone other than an attorney to prepare an instrument affecting real estate for direct or indirect compensation. 

Andrew Lieb, Esq. shares the steps in a real estate transaction. Click here to read the full article in Dan's Papers. 


Friday, February 15, 2019

Sexual Harassment in the Workplace - NYS Legislative Holds Hearings to Strengthen Laws

On February 13, 2019, the NYS legislature took testimony to examine proposals to strengthen NYS's sexual harassment laws, which are already the toughest in the Country.

The testimony is available for viewing here.

Employers - remember October 9, 2019 is your deadline to train all of your employees on sexual harassment pursuant to the requirements of Labor Law 201-g. Failure to train is a misdemeanor with many adverse consequences.

Comply with your requirements today at sexualharassmenttrainingny.com.


Thursday, February 14, 2019

Facebook has a non-discrimination policy - fair housing lawsuits are coming...

In the era of #MeToo, NYS' mandatory sexual harassment trainings (labor law 201-g), NYC's mandatory sexual harassment trainings (local law 96) and CA's expanded training requirement requirement (SB 1343), Facebook has gotten into the game.

This week, Facebook Advertisers are being required to certify that they "[h]ave reviewed and will abide by our Advertising Policies and all applicable laws" and "[w]ill not use Facebook Advertising for any wrongfully discriminatory practices." It is noted that Facebook's list of protected classes does not cover all classes protected by employment / housing discrimination laws and Facebook acknowledges this fact by stating "[s]ince non-discrimination laws vary by region, be sure to comply with our policy and relevant laws in your location and the location you're targeting."

Of note, Facebook is likely causing advertisers to agree in an attempt to insulate the platform from suit for hosting a hostile environment. However, agreeing to the policy certainly doesn't insulate the advertiser from suit.

So, be warned, your advertisements are being watched by Plaintiffs' counsel and you will be sued if you discriminate in any fashion. As such, targeting demographics is off limits and you should sell your product's / position's benefit and target user's prior preferences / searches, not specific users by their demographics (e.g., "race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, family/marital status, disability or medical or genetic condition") and how those demographics are correlated to predicted desires.


Monday, February 11, 2019

Brokering Illegal Real Estate Is Like Selling Drugs

Tuesday, February 05, 2019

Time Records Required For Rental Real Estate Brokers

Attention rental brokers – there is a new Safe Harbor available for your clients to claim qualified business income that is entitled to a 20% income tax deduction set forth at 26 USC §199A and your clients are going to need your help to qualify.   
The Safe Harbor, published by the IRS as “Section 199A, Trade or Business Safe Harbor: Rental Real Estate,” treats rental real estate enterprises as a qualifying trade or business for purposes of 26 USC §199A. 
Learn how to qualify by reading the full article by Andrew Lieb, Esq. published in the New York Real Estate Journal here. 


Thursday, January 31, 2019

Cash Offers on Real Estate Transactions: Option for Acquisition Mortgage Post-Closing

Buyers can pay cash at closing and reap the benefits of obtaining a loan on the property by purchasing a 90-day post-closing loan.

This can be helpful for buyers who want to make competitive cash offers, close quickly and subsequently obtain mortgage interest deduction benefits of the loan according to the IRS, Publication 936.

Read the full article by Andrew Lieb, Esq. published in The Suffolk Lawyer here. 


Suffolk County Bans Employers From Inquiring Into Applicants' Salary History

Because of the Restrict Information Regarding Salary and Earnings (RISE), Suffolk County Human Rights Law now prohibits employers from asking job applicants about their salary history. The new law is effective on June 30th, 2019.

Read the full article by Mordy Yankovich, Esq. at the Suffolk Lawyer here.


Tuesday, January 29, 2019

Real Tips HR: Sexual Harassment Prevention Trainings & Policies in NY

Learn what happens when NY Employers do not provide sexual harassment prevention trainings and policies to their employees. Every NYS employer must provide their employees with both an annual sexual harassment prevention training and policy pursuant to Labor Law section 201-g. It is a misdemeanor for Employers to violate the Labor Law and likely will trigger an EPLI insurance provider to disclaim coverage in a prospective sex discrimination lawsuit. Employment Experts Andrew Lieb, Esq. and Mordy Yankovich, Esq. share your risks.


Tuesday, January 22, 2019

Real estate salespersons must receive sexual harassment trainings - by Andrew Lieb

There are two different laws applicable to real estate salespersons and associate real estate brokers in New York City, which require sexual harassment prevention trainings. There is the New York State law and the New York City law. 

Read the full article by Andrew Lieb, Esq. published in the New York Real Estate Journal here. 


Monday, January 21, 2019

Real Tips HR: How Employers Should Handle Sexual Harassment Complaints after Party (Episode 1)

Introducing our new HR YOUTUBE channel - answering tough questions faced by employers so you don't have to. Stay tuned for more!

View Episode OneEmployment Attorneys Andrew Lieb and Mordy Yankovich share tips for Employers about how to handle an initial sexual harassment complaint stemming from an office holiday party. Learn to 1) obtain a statement; 2) with a witness; 3) using a complaint form; 4) to evaluate whether a formal investigation is necessary; and 5) to always have a sexual harassment policy at your workplace.


Hardwired or Sealed Smoke Detectors Required as of April 1, 2019

New York State homeowners and real estate professionals should be aware that starting April 1, 2019, smoke detectors must either be hardwired or be sealed and have a 10-year irreplaceable battery life.

New York General Business Law Section 399-ccc prohibits the sale, distribution or importation of any “solely battery operated smoke detecting alarm device powered by a replaceable, removable battery not capable of powering such device for a minimum of ten years.” In addition to the requirement that the solely battery operated smoke detector have a minimum battery life of ten (10) years, its product packaging must also state the manufacturer’s name or registered trademark and model number of the device.

The above requirements do not apply to battery operated smoke detectors already “ordered by, or are in the inventory of, owners, managing agents, contractors, wholesalers or retailers” on or before April 1, 2019. However, if these non-compliant smoke detectors are replaced after April 1, 2019, such replacement must comply with Section 399-ccc’s requirements.


New NYS Law Requires Equal Access to Diaper Changing Tables in Public Restrooms

NYS Department of State adopted a rule amending 19 NYCRR 1219 and adding 19 NYCRR 1229 to require newly constructed buildings and buildings undergoing a substantial renovation to include diaper changing stations if buildings have publicly accessible toilets.

Effective January 1, 2019, such buildings must meet requirements which include having at least one diaper changing station accessible to any gender available on each floor level with a public restroom. The new rules also address requirements as to accessibility, construction, installation, maintenance and signage of the diaper changing tables.

Failure to comply may result in criminal sanctions pursuant to Executive Law §382(2).

For more details, read the full text of the 19 NYCRR 1219 and 19 NYCRR 1229.



Saturday, January 19, 2019

Title Insurance Regulation 208 is Back - Soliciting Title Business is Seriously Restricted Yet Again

On January 15, 2019, the Appellate Division, First Department, reversed the Supreme Court in New York State Land Title Associations, Inc. v. The New York State Department of Financial Services (page 69).

To remind the reader, the New York County Supreme Court had previously annulled the Insurance Regulation which regulated title closer fees, ancillary charges, premiums and most importantly, soliciting business.

Now, the annulment is reversed (as if it never happened), except with respect to section 228.5(a)(1)-(3) [ancillary search fees] and (d)(1)-(2) [closer fees].

So, no more sports tickets, golf outings, holiday parties, open houses, and wining and dining to solicit title insurance business.

Now, to the entertaining part. What about all of the ancillary fees that were being charged by title insurance companies, above the regulatory caps, in between the annulment date and the reversal date? If a decision is reversed was it ever annulled? If it was never annulled were the caps on ancillary fees always applicable and were consumers overcharged. These are tough questions that Department of Financial Services should answer soon. Stay tuned and perhaps we will be hearing from the Court of Appeals to put finality to the legality of Insurance Regulation 208.


Rental Real Estate Safe Harbor - Tax Law

On January 18, 2019, the IRS issued the safe harbor for rental real estate to be treated as a trade or business for purposes of IRC 199A's Qualified Business Income 20% deduction.

Real etate professionals, who operate "a rental real estate enterprise... [which is] an interest in real property held for the production of rents and may consist of an interest in multiple properties," should study the safe harbor closely as it can make a huge difference in your pocketbook. Interestingly, while multiple properties may qualify as the same enterprise, "[c]ommercial and residential real estate may not be part of the same enterprise."

According to the IRS, the safe harbor requires:

(A) Separate books and records are maintained to reflect income and expenses for each rental real estate enterprise;
(B) For taxable years beginning prior to January 1, 2023, 250 or more hours of rental services are performed (as described in this revenue procedure) per year with respect to the rental enterprise. For taxable years beginning after December 31, 2022, in any three of the five consecutive taxable
years that end with the taxable year (or in each year for an enterprise held for less than five years), 250 or more hours of rental services are performed (as described in this revenue procedure) per year with respect to the rental real estate enterprise; and
(C) The taxpayer maintains contemporaneous records, including time reports, logs, or similar documents, regarding the following: (i) hours of all services performed; (ii) description of all services performed; (iii) dates on which such services were performed; and (iv) who performed the services. Such records are to be made available for inspection at the request of the IRS. The contemporaneous records requirement will not apply to taxable years beginning prior to January 1, 2019

To claim the safe harbor, "include a statement attached to the return on which it claims the section 199A deduction or passes through section 199A information that the requirements in Section 3.03 of this revenue procedure have been satisfied."


Saturday, January 12, 2019

Risk and Penalties To Employers Who Fail To Provide Sexual Harassment Prevention Training in NY

Some employers want to know if they can chose to take the penalty and forego the NY required sexual harassment prevention training, policy and complaint form. Here is a cost benefit analysis explanation that you should read before making such a terrible decision.

The fines can be huge, although that isn't even the start of an explanation of the problems that an employer will face if they choose to forgo compliance with Labor Law 201-g (i.e., training their employees, providing a sexual harassment prevention policy, and offering a complaint form). Please understand that the penalties are applied per a provision of the law violated and not by an employer who violates, in general, as a single penalty. Therefore, each employee can represent at least 3 violations. The fines start at $100 per employee for the first violation and goes up from there (fines go up per number of violations such as not training, not providing a sexual harassment prevention policy and not supplying a complaint form with fines being compounded per employee).  So for a mid size company, fines can be in the tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars. We recommend taking a look at Labor Law 213 to understand further. When reading, you will learn that the real risk is that violating the Labor Law is chargeable with a misdemeanor and possible imprisonment. 

Beyond these surface Labor Law penalties, failure to train / have a policy / provide a complaint form will be catastrophic to an employer in defending a sex discrimination lawsuit because 2 important defenses will be lost, including:
  1. The Kolstad v. American Dental Association Affirmative Defense, which avoids punitive damages.
  1. The Burlington Industries Inc. v. Ellerth & Faragher v. City of Boca Raton Affirmative Defense, which avoids an employer being liable for a hostile work environment created by a supervisor if harassment doesn't result in a tangible employment action (e.g., denial of raise / promotion).
Beyond the loss of these defenses, it will be nearly impossible for any attorney, no matter how skilled, to defend a lawsuit where an employer willfully failed to comply with a law designed to prevent the very experience complained of by the victim in the first instance. Imagine the opening statements at a trial:

Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury, the defendants actively chose to forgo training their staff on sexual harassment prevention, as every other employer in this State is required to do, because they clearly want to maintain a chauvinistic workplace where women are treated as objects not equals. Today, we ask you to teach them a lesson. We ask you to teach all employers a lesson. Women matter. Women have rights. The workplace must be safe. The Labor Law insists that it is. We ask you to teach the defendants a lesson that violating the law is not a choice. New York State introduced Labor Law 201-g to prevent the very harassment that occurred to the Plaintiff. No, the defendants did not have a sexual harassment prevention policy to tell everyone what behavior was unacceptable in the workplace although they were required to have such a policy. No, the defendants did not have a sexual harassment prevention training to clarify what behavior was unacceptable in the workplace although they were required to have such a training. No, the defendants did not have a sexual harassment prevention complaint form to empower victims to protect themselves from unacceptable harassment occuring in the workplace although they were required to have such a complaint form. These defendants actively chose to violate the laws of this State and now they must answer. Some people only understand rules when they are forced to right a check. We ask you to teach them the rules. These defendants need to learn the rules about sexual harassment in the workplace. Sexual harassment will not be tolerated...   
To add insult to injury, it is anticipated that an employer with an EPLI policy in place to avoid this pain will learn quickly how easily coverage under such a policy can be disclaimed (i.e., no insurance defense or damages paid) for violating Labor Law 201-g. So, the employer will be stuck with paying exorbitant legal fees (i.e., these cases take a long time and are very fact intensive) and damages, without the very insurance policy, which they've been paying premiums on for years, in place. 
We are sure that you understand that this isn't the type of law that you can just do a cost / benefit analysis and decide to take the penalty. The risk is simply off the charts. In our opinion, if an employer defends a cognizable lawsuit without having complied with Labor Law 201-g, they may, very predictably, be going out of business. 


The trial will be painful for the employer to say the least. 


Wednesday, January 02, 2019

NYREJ: Year in Review 2018: Andrew Lieb, Lieb at Law, P.C.

Tuesday, January 01, 2019

Discrimination: Therapy Dogs in 2019

Game-changing developments are expected to occur in 2019 with respect to therapy dogs (i.e., service dogs and emotional support dogs) and real estate professionals must monitor these developments as they occur to stay on top of their game and avoid facing a lawsuit.

As some background, on April 18, 2018, Governor Cuomo signed S7319 into law. This statute charged "the commissioner of agriculture and markets shall convene a working group to examine the need for statewide standards for therapy dogs." Then, in October 2018, the working group published "A Report from the New York State Therapy Dog Working Group".

The Report is clear to note that "[therapy dogs are not defined in other laws under the Americans With Disabilities Act, Federal Housing Authority, NYS Human Rights Law, or New York City Human Rights Law" and that the current definition found at Article 7 of the Agriculture and Markets Law should be expanded to include "private homes" to its current definition of "any dog that is trained to aid the emotional and physical health of patients in hospitals, nursing homes, retirement homes and other settings and is actually used for such purpose, or any dog during the period such dog is being trained or bred for such purpose, and does not qualify under federal or state law or regulations as a service dog." As such, the definition would be relevant to suit under the New York State Human Rights Law (i.e., discrimination in housing) - Real Estate Brokers, Property Managers and Landlords take notice.

The Report calls for "standards regarding training, evaluation, certification, and identification of therapy dogs... especially in relation to service dogs and emotional support dogs." It is expected that further statutes will follow to enact the recommendations of the Report. It's important for real estate professionals to monitor these statutes as they go from bill to law rather than to learn about their rules from receiving a Summons and Complaint. Remember, the best real estate professionals are on the cutting-edge on changes to the law. Leveraging those changes makes you money. 


Thursday, December 27, 2018

Supreme Court Expands Reach of ADEA

In a decision dated Nov. 6, 2018, the United States Supreme Court broadened the scope of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) to cover state and local governments regardless of number of employees. Public employers must now be advised that they may be liable under the ADEA, regardless of number of employees, and face additional exposure for claims of age discrimination.

Read the full article by Mordy Yankovich, Esq. published in The Suffolk Lawyer here. 

Contracts of Sale: Preserving Rights is Transactional Counsel's Job

The dichotomy between a litigation and a transactional practice is stark. Simply, transactional counsel needs to adhere to the game of hot potato — don’t get stuck as the recipient of a notice when the music stops. Instead, counsel must assert a preservation right whenever counsel receives a notice that asserts contrary rights by the other party. Then, counsel should consult with litigation counsel to collaborate on how to best achieve the client’s goal through a hybrid of leveraging litigation and negotiating terms.

Click here to read the full article published in The Suffolk Lawyer. 

Tuesday, December 11, 2018

Anatomy of a Real Estate Lawsuit with Andrew M. Lieb

A lawsuit is not what you see on TV. On TV, a lawsuit is won by an attorney marching into court with a grand display of showmanship and a cunning tongue. The TV judge hearing the case makes a spot decision and it’s all over and decided before the final commercial break. In reality, a civil litigation takes years and is much more of a chess match than a swordfight. As opposed to this courtroom drama, a real case is typically decided on paper submissions that may be heard months after they are first provided to the court. Additionally, the decision is often made on a technical procedural rule, not on the merits or substance of the litigation.

You see, being right isn’t everything in real litigation. Instead, a real lawsuit is all about knowing how to play the game. The following is a summary of the stages of a litigation, but this chess match isn’t linear and each of the stages can appear out of order and can even reoccur again and again. So, civil litigants need a skilled advocate who is a master of the game if they want a shot at victory. Here is your game board:



Monday, December 10, 2018

Lieb at Law Seeks Junior Associate Attorney to join team

Lieb at Law, P.C., is seeking a junior associate attorney to support the firms widely expanding litigation and transactional practice. This role will work across the firms practice areas. Competence trumps experience and career growth is limited only by your own ability, ambition and desire to learn and evolve. We are looking for a potential star that is intellectually driven, who does not cut corners, has a fresh approach, thinks outside-the-box and can provide tangible fact-driven support. 

Desired qualifications:
  • Must love technology and use it always, must be comfortable in a paperless office with cloud based systems
  • Demonstrated proficiency in legal writing and oral advocacy;
  • Dedicated, organized and detail-orientated;
  • Ability to leverage substance rather than emotion;
  • Experience drafting contracts.
Practice Areas:
  • Transactions: Commercial and Residential Real Estate Purchase and Lease Transactions, Business Transactions and Negotiations.
  • Litigation: Commercial Litigation, Real Estate Litigation, Real Estate Brokerage Litigation, Title Litigation, Plaintiff Personal Injury, Landlord/Tenant, Estate Litigation and more.
  • Employment Litigation, Compliance and Trainings: Discrimination, Harassment, Retaliation, Wage and Hour, Restrictive Covenants, Family Medical Leave Act, Alternative Dispute Resolution, Appeals; Employee Handbooks and Policies, Sexual Harassment and Discrimination Training, Wage and Hour Audits & more.
  • Legal Compliance for Regulated Industries: Outside Compliance Counsel for regulated professions, Policy Drafting, Policy Implementation, Auditing, Corporate Compliance Trainings.
  • Estate Planning and Probate: Last Wills, Advance Directives, Trusts, and Probate Administration.
Qualifications:
Candidate must have 1 year of experience at a law firm.  Excellent critical thinking, writing, organization and research (Westlaw) skills.  Must be technologically savvy and detail oriented. 

Lieb at Law is different:
The law firm is a part-owner of a New York State Licensed Real Estate School, Lieb School, which offers in-class and digital courses throughout New York State and Connecticut. Lieb at Law, P.C. attorneys draft curriculum and teach at the school where they have the opportunity to establish themselves as topical experts and drive the future of the real estate brokerage industry. The law firm's sister firm, Lieb Compliance, leverages legal change to enhance business services. Lieb Compliance offers sexual harassment trainings and employment law support services. 

About the firm:
The firm was founded in 1977. In 2009, Andrew Lieb acquired control of the firm and transformed its legal services from a general practice to a commercial litigation boutique focusing on real estate and legal compliance for regulated industries.

The firm’s litigation practice is driven by leveraging informational imbalances to win cases. This is a substance first law firm where data drives decision making and strategy.

To achieve the firm’s information focused litigation culture, staff have access to cloud-based legal research platform so the latest cases are available to our legal team everywhere, including within the courtroom. Next, a secure, cloud-based case management system catalogs every thought and action on each client’s matter. As a result, case facts are readily accessible through the stroke of a computer key, instead of being locked away in one attorney’s memory or private paper notes in some desk draw. Finally, enterprise file sharing, storage and collaboration software is utilized to enable the efficient collaboration between attorneys where case strategy and document preparation benefits from fresh and innovative group think.

Lieb at Law’s latest research and collaboration tools extend to the firm’s transactional team, which ensures that contractual language is driven by our real life experiential learning from our contractual litigating practice.

Lastly, we publish and teach the law that we practice in order to always stay on the cutting edge. Lieb at Law’s work product is a derivative of embracing education and technology to provide a modern law firm that is at the vanguard of representation.

-

To Apply email resume and cover letter to careers@liebatlaw.com


Wednesday, December 05, 2018

Everything you need to know about NY Mandatory Sexual Harassment Prevention Trainings & Policies

Every NYS employer must provide their employees with both an annual sexual harassment prevention training and policy pursuant to Labor Law section 201-g. It is a misdemeanor for Employers to violate the Labor Law and likely will trigger an EPLI insurance provider to disclaim coverage in a prospective sex discrimination lawsuit.

Highlights:
  • Sexual Harassment Policies: All employers must adopt and provide a sexual harassment prevention policy to all employees by 10/9/18. If your company already has a sexual harassment policy, make sure that it meets or exceeds the newly required minimum standards.
  • All Employees Must Be Trained: Between 10/9/18 and 10/9/19 all employees must be trained and annually thereafter on each employee's anniversary, start date or date selected by employer.
  • New Employees Must Be Trained and Provided Policies ImmediatelyEmployers are liable for the actions of employees immediately upon hire, the State encourages training as soon as possible.
  • NYC Independent Contractors: The NYC Commission on Human Rights requires employers with 15 or more employees (which includes independent contractors) to provide training to all independent contractors who have performed work for the employer for more than 90 days or 80 hours in a calendar year.
  • Policy and Training For Independent Contractors: The State Human Rights Law imposes liability on the employer for their actions and encourages employers to provide the policy and training to anyone providing services in the workplace including contractors, subcontractors, vendors and consultants.
Why Employers Should Not Use NYS Sample Policy:
  1. It does not address every other protected class under which an employer can be sued for discrimination (e.g., race, religion, color, national origin, sex [including pregnancy], military status, age, marital status, sexual orientation, gender expression or identity, genetic information, disability or any other personal characteristics considered to be a protected class under applicable federal, state or local laws). Updating the policy matters because when sued for discrimination by a different protected class, you will be able to explain that everyone is protected in the workplace.
  2. It does not list potential remedial measures (e.g., termination, suspension, probation, demotion, reassignment, etc.). Updating the policy matters because employees who do not know the consequences are unlikely to care about changing behavior and, more importantly, without clear expectations an employer can be sued for arbitrarily applying their policy in a discriminatory manner.
  3. It does not cause an employee to agree to its terms and to acknowledge written receipt of the policy and complaint form, which is required by law. Updating the policy matters because without records you have nothing when faced with a Department of Labor audit or a prospective lawsuit. More so, you can justify termination for cause when an employee violates your policy, which they affirmatively agreed to follow.
Why Employers Should Not Use NYS Sample Training Videos:
  • NYS has released videos to comply with the NYS required sexual harassment training under Labor Law 201-g. However, the website for the videos expressly advises that they are non-compliant.  "the videos alone are NOT considered interactive. If you are using this video to meet the training requirements, you must also: ask questions of employees as part of the program; accommodate questions asked by employees, with answers provided in a timely manner; or require feedback from employees about the training and the materials presented."
What To Look For In A Sexual Harassment Training Vendor:
  • A system to track that employees took the training in anticipation of a Department of Labor audit;
  • A system to track that the sexual harassment policy and complaint form were distributed in writing and agreed to be followed (i.e., clickwrap) by the employee - distribution of these documents is also required;
  • A branded policy and training, with both addressing all types of discrimination, beyond just sexual harassment, because the employer may face a discrimination suit on a different protected class and wouldn't want to have to explain to a jury why they only cared about sex discrimination, not the applicable protected class (e.g., race, marital status, disability, etc.); and
  • Most importantly, a digital on-demand product because the training needs to be instantly available to new employees (i.e., NYS requires trainings as soon as possible from start date and NYC requires trainings within 90 days of start date)
Why Lieb Compliance Is Your Solution: 
Lieb Compliance offers a solution that not only complies with all of the updated regulations but also helps defend prospective litigation.
  • Complies with both Labor Law 201-g and Local Law 96 (NYS / NYC requirements for sexual harassment prevention) 
  • Our platform is an interactive video that employees can take at their convenience with a high speed Internet connection. The platform includes a branded sexual harassment prevention policy and complaint form that requires employees to download and review the form
  • Our competitors rarely offer an opportunity for employers to require that their employees affirmatively agree to be bound by their policy through a digital clickwrap receipt 
  • Our content and instructor, Andrew Lieb, who teaches through case studies and practical advice, not theory. Mr. Lieb, Esq is an employment law litigator and is regarded as one of the best legal educators in the country who can make a boring required topic, like sexual harassment prevention, come to life through humor and fun. That is why our trainings have continuously received rave reviews from C-suite executives, who frequently tell us that our trainings have transformed employee compliance into a morale building experience. Simply, employees thank their bosses for hiring Lieb Compliance
To learn more, check out our demo and you will be sold.



Monday, December 03, 2018

Lieb at Law is Hiring a Real Estate Paralegal

Lieb at Law, P.C. seeks digitally savvy, detail oriented and motivated paralegal. The firm services the New York Metro area, inclusive of the Hamptons and Manhattan and represents sellers, buyers and lenders in residential and commercial real estate closings. 

The firm is a paperless office with a focus on technology and substance. Must be friendly, charismatic and organized. We will grow your career and teach you how to reach the next level.


The firm’s sister company is one of the largest real estate schools in the state offering in-person and digital continuing education classes to real estate brokers and salespersons.
Responsibilities:
  • Drafting and reviewing contracts of sale
  • Ordering and clearing title
  • Coordinating with brokers, surveyors, expeditors, lenders and other client-vendors
  • Managing client needs
  • Coordinating closings
  • Maintaining files as always up-to-date through use of case management technology
  • New business intake – opening and closing files and tracking / closing potential cases
  • Preparing closing statements
  • Answering telephones, distributing mail and deliveries, announcing visitors, maintaining office appearance, watering plants, making coffee, and generally helping throughout entire law firm
  • Managing closing department calendar
Requirements:
  • Must love technology and use it always
  • Need to love sales – be charismatic / friendly / hungry
  • Required to be self-sufficient and take pride in your work-product
  • Success requires a detail-oriented / organized / multi-tasker
  • Proficient in Microsoft Word, Excel, and Google Calendar
  • Active presence on Social Media
  • Minimum of typing 60+ words per minute
  • Minimum Associates Degree from accredited college. Bachelor’s Degree preferred
  • Cannot be a practicing real estate salesperson / associate broker due to conflicts
Email Resumes to Careers@liebatlaw.com


Thursday, November 29, 2018

Lease Suggestion to Avoid Discrimination

According to the NYC Commission on Human Rights Legal Enforcement Guidance on Discrimination on the Basis of Disability, "a “no pets” policy in a lease, should be clear about the availability of and the process for seeking and granting an exception or modification to the policy as a reasonable accommodation."

As should be discerned, using a form lease is very dangerous and landlords need to understand that a properly drafted tailored lease is about exposure mitigation more than anything else.


Monday, November 26, 2018

New laws expected as Democrats take control of NYS Legislature

This is not a politically charged article, but a functional article predicting the future. As a result of the November 6, 2018 elections, New York State no longer has a deadlocked Senate and many bills will now pass.

In 2018, the Democrats gained control of 40 seats and the Republicans gained control of 23 seats in the Senate giving them a majority from the prior 32 / 31 Republican control. Also, the Assembly remains democratic, as it has historically been since 1975. After the elections, the Assembly was 104 / 43 Democratic control.

With both New York State Senate and Assembly being dominated by Democrats, it is expected that more bills will be passed. The New York State Legislature is now less likely to be at an impasse on voting on the passage of bills. As such, stay tuned for updates on proposed bills and their passage, especially those related to real estate and employment law.


Tuesday, November 20, 2018

Christmas Party Sexual Harassment Prevention


It’s time to prepare for your office’s holiday party in the era of sexual harassment. Your company, like mine, probably has a holiday party scheduled. The company party will have alcohol and co-workers, which should terrify employers in the era of #MeToo. Beyond #MeToo, this is also the era of sexual harassment trainings, where every employee in NYS is being educated about their rights when faced with improper conduct. Simply, employees are being told that they have a right to sue the company.

Under this landscape, HR needs to thread-the-needle between keeping the party positive so that it achieves its intended purpose of boosting employee morale, while also setting ground rules that will insulate the company from a sex discrimination lawsuit. To accomplish these competing objectives, HR should email the team a reminder about the awesome events planned, while also including the following five reminders about the party:

  1. The Standard: Remind employees that the sexual harassment standard is subjective and it’s about whether conduct is unwelcomed, not whether the target of the conduct acquiesced to the conduct. Furthermore, employees need to be reminded of the breadth of what can constitute harassment. Beyond the traditional understanding of unwelcomed touching, even “harmless” small talk can be actionable if it’s sexist, sexual, homophobic, gender-stereotypical, and the like.
  2. Policy Effectiveness: Employees need to know that regardless of the location where the party is held and irrespective if the party occurs after working hours, the Company’s sexual harassment and anti-discrimination policies remain in full force and effect. Incident to the policy being in effect, employees should receive a copy of the policy and be reminded of the adverse work consequences that can result if an employee is a perpetrator of harassment.
  3. See Something / Say Something: Most importantly, employees should be empowered to be the solution to eliminate sexual harassment. This can be accomplished by reminding employees of the simple rule of if you see something, say something, which when implemented can effectively stop unwelcomed conduct before it crosses the line and becomes harassment.
  4. Providing the Complaint Form: While avoiding harassment is the first goal, providing victims with resources must be a close number two. To accomplish this, HR should provide all employees with a copy of the complaint form and remind employees of the procedure undertaken when a complaint is received. By providing an avenue for employees to be heard and harassment to be addressed, employers can often avoid a lawsuit and at the least, have a good defense if the employee nonetheless sues.
  5. False Complaints: While the act of setting forth the potential remedial measures faced by a harasser is a great dissuader of improper conduct, improper complaints should also be addressed by HR. However, HR must address false complaints with precision because everyone must be empowered to make legitimate complaints and not feel that they will be retaliated against. Remember, retaliation, which would reasonably discourage a worker from making or supporting a sexual harassment claim, is disallowed conduct. As such, HR should remind the team that an improper complaint is not one where harassment has not occurred, but, instead, where the complaint was made as a sword against a co-worker as opposed to a shield to protect against harassment. That being said, false complaints are a real thing and they must be avoided in order to root out harassment and make everyone safe at the workplace. As such, HR should suggest that employees avoid one-on-ones if they are afraid of improper complaints. By having a co-worker around, the employee will have a witness to corroborate their version of what transpired. Also, HR should remind everyone that a false complaint can result in criminal harassment charges under the Penal Law and/or a civil defamation lawsuit between co-employees. So, complaints are only to be made if they are brought in good faith.