AirBnB / VRBO Hosts are Going to be Taxed in NYS Starting April 20, 2025

Starting April 20, 2025, short-term rental hosts across NYS will be in for a rude awakening by way of A4130C. This law creates a statewide short-term rental registration requirement for owners, which is designed to facilitate the State in collecting occupancy taxes while tracking the hosts. 

To be clear, NYS is now treating short-term rentals like hotel rooms under the Tax Law - this is certainly going to cut into profits for hosts &/or make renting an AirBnB / VRBO more expensive for guests. 

For hosts, this means much more paperwork, stricter rules, and some hefty penalties for noncompliance. Specifically, the Department of State will give you 2 warnings & then, start levying the fines at hundreds of dollars per day, per violation. 

New York is not alone in its quest to regulate short-term rentals. Cities like San Francisco, Boston, and Los Angeles have already implemented similar measures. However, New York’s approach stands out for its focus on statewide coordination, which could become a model for other states grappling with the complexities of regulating the short-term rental industry.

Contact the Author of this post

NYC Provides Protections for Individuals with Criminal Histories from Discrimination

NYC has clarified that it is illegal to discriminate in housing against applicants / occupants with criminal histories by way of Local Law 24, also known as the Fair Chance in Housing Act 2025, effective January 1, 2025. 

That said, it was already impliedly the law everywhere throughout the US as we previously explained here. 

Regardless, the new NYC law explicitly prohibits property owners, managers, & brokers from:

• Refusing to rent, sell, and/or lease housing accommodations based solely on criminal history, except under specific circumstances outlined in the law.
• Performing criminal background checks outside the law's defined parameters, including searching records and/or asking applicants about their criminal history without proper notice & justification.
• Using criminal history to set terms or conditions that disadvantage individuals with such backgrounds.

Into the weeds, there is nuance in the NYC Local Law because it differentiates between “reviewable” and “non-reviewable” criminal history where sealed convictions, youthful offender adjudications, and certain federal or out-of-state offenses cannot be used to deny housing, but convictions for serious offenses (e.g., recent felony convictions) may be reviewed through a detailed and exposure riddled process, including providing notice and conducting an individualized assessment. The process requires: 

• Making a conditional offer to the applicant.
• Notifying the applicant in writing of any intended criminal background check.
• Allowing the applicant to provide mitigating information if adverse action is contemplated.

Plus, a landlord must demonstrate a legitimate business interest tied to the decision if they'd like to deny on criminal history. 

That all said, the main takeaway is that housing applicants / occupants with criminal histories are going to be filing housing discrimination complaints starting in 2025. If you are a property owner, manager, or real estate broker, expect to get served by the NYC Commission on Human Rights if you plan to make any housing decisions based on an applicant's / occupant's criminal history. Plus, there are big numbers that you can lose including the "victim's" attorneys' fees if they sue you with a private attorney. Take this very seriously & immediately stop screening based on criminal history today. 

New NYS Law Lets Models Sue Agencies for Abuse

Effective June 19, 2025, the New York State Fashion Workers Act, A05631E, will protect New York's 180,000 fashion industry professionals--models, influencers, photographers, and stylists--from their management company's exploitation through unfair pay, sexual abuse, harassment, and discrimination.

Now, victims can bring a new lawsuit for experiencing unsafe working conditions, exploitative contracts, delayed payments, and abuse where they can collect liquidated damages (double to three times damages) and attorneys' fees. 

The Act Requires:

• A zero tolerance policy for abuse, harassment, or other forms of inappropriate behavior
• Models to receive copies of the final agreement that has been negotiated 
• Overtime payments of at least 50% higher than contracted hourly rate for work exceeding 8 hours in a 24 hour period 
• Meal breaks for jobs over 8 hours
• Liability insurance for models’ health and safety
• Management agencies commission is capped 20%
• Management agencies must utilize transparent contracts & provide copies to models
• Clear consent for the use of digital replicas
• Modeling agencies to register with the State of New York to operate

Prohibited practices that could lead to a lawsuit under the Act (plus related laws) include:

• Discrimination / harassing models on the based of sex, orientation, race, color ethnicity, national origin, disability and other categories  
• Retaliatory action against models for filing complaints
• Making power of attorney a necessary condition for entering into a contract with an agency
• Collecting signing fees or deposits from models
• Deducting fees other than agreed upon commission from models' earnings
• Renewing contracts without models' consent
• Creating, altering, or manipulating a model's digital replica using AI without models' clear written consent.

These new lawsuits are designed to close a loophole that modeling agencies have utilized to escape licensing & regulation by considering themselves management companies, rather than talent agencies, under New York State General Business Law § 171(8), known as the "incidental booking exception." 

New Mortgage Applicant Pamphlet Requirement on Residential Purchases

Starting on June 11, 2025, NY residential real estate purchasers will receive a new pamphlet, called "What Mortgage Applicants Need to Know," pursuant to A9686.

This pamphlet is going to be created by the NYS Department of Financial Services and it will be available on the Department's Website - https://www.dfs.ny.gov/ where lenders have an affirmative duty to provide the form and put it on their website, as described in the law.

The pamphlet will equip all mortgage applicants, and especially non-English speaking homebuyers, with information on interest rates and market comparisons before they engage with lenders and bankers. Lenders and bankers are also required to provide buyers with the pamphlet. 

Loan officers (LO) beware - this pamphlet directs consumers to file a complaint with CFPB if such consumer believes that such LO violated the law. 

Real Estate Brokers beware - this pamphlet directs consumers to file a complaint with DOS if such consumer believes that such broker violated the law "in working with you to purchase a home," which is without limitation to lending. 

In fact, the pamphlet, developed by the Department of Financial Services, must include the following minimum requirements:

"'WHAT MORTGAGE APPLICANTS NEED TO KNOW'
   AS AN APPLICANT FOR A RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO:
   1. COMPARE AND NEGOTIATE THE CHARGES OF DIFFERENT MORTGAGE BROKERS AND
 LENDERS TO OBTAIN THE BEST LOAN POSSIBLE.
   2.  ASK YOUR MORTGAGE BROKER TO EXPLAIN SUCH PERSON'S RESPONSIBILITIES
 WITHIN THE MORTGAGE LENDING PROCESS.
   3. KNOW HOW MUCH THE MORTGAGE BROKER IS COMPENSATED  BY  YOU  AND  THE
 LENDER FOR YOUR LOAN.

 4. A CLEAR AND TRUTHFUL EXPLANATION OF THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE
 LOAN.
   5.  KNOW IF THE LOAN BEING OFFERED IS A FIXED OR ADJUSTABLE RATE MORT-
 GAGE LOAN, WHETHER THE LOAN CAN BE TRANSFERRED OR REFINANCED,  KNOW  THE
 EXACT  AMOUNT  OF  YOUR  MONTHLY  LOAN PAYMENTS, INCLUDING ANY PROJECTED
 ESCROW PAYMENTS, KNOW THE FINAL ANNUAL PERCENTAGE  RATE  (APR)  AND  THE
 AMOUNT OF REGULAR PAYMENTS AT THE LOAN'S CLOSING.
   6.  ASK  FOR  LOAN  ESTIMATE DETAILING ALL LOAN AND SETTLEMENT CHARGES
 BEFORE YOU AGREE TO THE LOAN AND PAY ANY FEES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITA-
 TION LOAN APPLICATION FEES, TITLE SEARCH AND  INSURANCE  FEES,  LENDER'S
 ATTORNEY  FEES, PROPERTY APPRAISAL CHARGES, INSPECTIONS, RECORDING FEES,
 LATE PAYMENT FEES, TRANSFER TAXES, POINT AND  ORIGINATION  FEES,  ESCROW
 ACCOUNT BALANCES, WHICH SERVICES A LOAN APPLICANT CAN SHOP FOR AND WHICH
 THEY  CANNOT, AND YOU ARE ENTITLED TO RECEIVE SUCH ESTIMATE WITHIN THREE
 BUSINESS DAYS OF APPLYING FOR A LOAN.
   7. OBTAIN CREDIT COUNSELING BEFORE CLOSING A LOAN.
   8. DECIDE WHETHER OR NOT TO FINANCE ANY PORTION OF THE POINTS OR FEES.
   9. REFUSE TO PURCHASE CREDIT INSURANCE FOR ANY MORTGAGE LOAN.
   10. HAVE YOUR PROPERTY APPRAISED BY AN  INDEPENDENT  LICENSED  PROFES-
 SIONAL AND TO RECEIVE A COPY OF THE APPRAISAL.
   11. NOT BE SUBJECT TO DECEPTIVE MARKETING PRACTICES.
   12.  ASK  FOR THE CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU'S BOOKLET "YOUR
 HOME LOAN TOOLKIT".
   13. RECEIVE THE FOLLOWING  DOCUMENTS,  AND  EVERY  DOCUMENT  OTHERWISE
 REQUIRED  TO BE GIVEN TO YOU AT CLOSING UNDER FEDERAL AND NEW YORK STATE
 LAW:
   A. LOAN ESTIMATE,
   B. CLOSING DISCLOSURE.
   14. KNOW WHAT DEPOSITS AND FEES ARE NOT REFUNDABLE IF  YOU  DECIDE  TO
 CANCEL THE LOAN AGREEMENT.
   15.  RECEIVE  IN  WRITING  THE  REASON  FOR  THE DENIAL OR CONDITIONAL
 APPROVAL OF YOUR LOAN APPLICATION.
   16. IF REFINANCING, YOU MAY CANCEL A LOAN WITHIN  THREE  DAYS  OF  THE
 CLOSING  BY  PROVIDING  WRITTEN  NOTIFICATION  OF  CANCELLATION  TO  THE
 LICENSED LENDER OR BANKING INSTITUTION.
   17. RECEIVE THE CLOSING DISCLOSURE THREE DAYS BEFORE THE CLOSING TAKES
 PLACE.
   18. HAVE ANY LENDING DISPUTES RESOLVED IN A FAIR AND EQUITABLE MANNER.
   19. A CREDIT DECISION  THAT  IS  NOT  BASED  UPON  YOUR  RACE,  COLOR,
 NATIONAL ORIGIN, RELIGION, SEX, FAMILY STATUS, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, DISA-
 BILITY OR WHETHER ANY INCOME IS FROM PUBLIC ASSISTANCE.
   20.  FILE  A  COMPLAINT  WITH THE DEP
ARTMENT OR THE CONSUMER FINANCIAL
 PROTECTION BUREAU IF YOU BELIEVE THAT A MORTGAGE  BROKER  OR  ANY  OTHER
 ENTITY  LICENSED  BY THE DEPARTMENT OR THE CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION
 BUREAU HAS VIOLATED ANY RULES, REGULATIONS OR  LAWS  WHICH  GOVERN  SUCH
 PERSON'S CONDUCT IN WORKING WITH YOU TO GET OR PROCESS A MORTGAGE LOAN.
   21.  FILE  A  COMPLAINT WITH THE NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF STATE OR
 THE CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU IF  YOU  BELIEVE  THAT  A  REAL
 ESTATE  BROKER  HAS VIOLATED ANY RULES, REGULATIONS OR LAWS WHICH GOVERN
 SUCH PERSON'S CONDUCT IN WORKING WITH YOU TO PURCHASE A HOME."

Do Employment Discrimination Victims Need to File for Workers' Compensation to Win Big Emotional Distress Damages?

Victims of employment discrimination in New York will be well pressed to file for Workers' Compensation concerning any related emotional distress starting on January 1, 2025 or they will be very limited in recovering emotional distress damages as part of their discrimination claim.

Specifically, Workers' Compensation Law 10(3)(b) has been amended, by A5745, to permit all "worker[s to] file[] claim[s] for mental injury premised upon extraordinary work-related stress incurred at work."

Previously, the availability of Workers' Compensation for "mental injury premised upon extraordinary work-related stress" only applied to emergency service workers (police, firefighter, emergency medical technician, paramedic, & emergency dispatcher), but now it applies across the board to all workers. Moreover, Worker's Compensation for such mental injuries was previously limited to "work-related emergency" and now it just must occur "at work." This amended law is very broad and clearly applies to all workers for work related post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

That all said, a worker seeking to obtain Workers' Compensation benefits for such mental injuries still has the burden of demonstrating a causal relationship supported by a rational basis between his work and his documented PTSD diagnosis. To prove this connection, a worker should hire both Workers' Compensation counsel and Employment Discrimination counsel as the two claims are now wholly interrelated and a failure of one will hurt the other and vice-versa. 

Learn more about the author of this blog here

Avoiding Discrimination in AI: CLE from Lieb at Law's Claudia Cannam

As artificial intelligence continues to transform industries, it also presents unique legal challenges, particularly in avoiding discriminatory practices embedded in AI systems. To help attorneys navigate these complexities, Lieb at Law Associate Claudia Cannam recently taught a 1-credit CLE course through Quimbee, titled “Avoiding Discrimination in AI.”

Avoiding Discrimination in AI: In order to navigate some of the legal challenges that come with new tech, you must understand the hidden biases in artificial intelligence systems and their legal impact. This course will dive into how AI discrimination occurs and its real-world consequences. We will review practical advice and strategies for avoiding discrimination when using AI.

Register Now: Attorneys can register for Claudia Cannam's Avoiding Discrimination in AI CLE course here.

Ted Cruz Protects Women - the Take It Down Act Passes Senate

Sponsored by Ted Cruz, the Take It Down Act (S4569) has passed the Senate and heads to the House so that a newly inaugurated President Trump can protect women from online sexual harassment, including revenge porn. 

Is Trump 2.0 going to be the protector of women? He did say that he is the protector of women “whether the women like it or not," maybe foreshadowing signing this bill? 

Anyway, to the law, it modifies the criminal prohibition on intentional disclosure of nonconsensual intimate visual depictions (47 USC 223) by inserting a new subsection (g). This new section includes penalties of up to 2 years in prison (3 if it involves a minor). Under the law, it's now (if signed by Trump) unlawful to use an interactive computer service to knowingly publish an intimate visual depiction of an identifiable individual where their was a reasonable expectation of privacy, amongst other crimes. Plus, there is a restitution section where victims can receive compensation for their pain, including for psychological care, lost income, and attorneys’ fees, plus any costs incurred in obtaining a civil protection order. 

To be clear, the law is not sex / gender specific and in fact, there is a section about utilizing a digital forgery of a person without consent, regardless if it it contains intimate depiction.

Think Disabled Employees Should be Paid AT LEAST Minimum Wage?

The Federal Department of Labor is seeking by Proposed Rulemaking to eliminate certificates that had allowed employers to pay productivity-based subminimum wages to workers with disabilities without violating the Fair Labor Standards Act. 

Think it's a good idea?

Regardless, think Trump thinks it's a good idea? 

Interesting time to make such a change given that Trump likes that cheap labor regardless that the purpose of the curtailments was altruistic in creating opportunities for employment for the disabled. 

Anyway, you can share your thoughts on or before January 17, 2025, identified by Regulatory Information Number (RIN) 1235-AA14, by either of the following methods:

• Electronic Comments: Submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Address written submissions to: Division of Regulations, Legislation, and Interpretation, Wage and Hour Division, U.S. Department of Labor, Room S-3502, 200 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20210.

New NYS Law Protects Against Hate Crimes Targeting Religious Attire Creating Evidence of Discrimination

New York State is taking a strong stand against hate crimes and by doing so, are enhancing discrimination claims in the workplace, in housing, and in education. Specifically, starting on November 26, 2024, it became a crime to remove or threaten to remove someone's religious attire. 

The new law (S05302) amends Section 240.30 of the New York Penal Law, which defines certain acts of aggravated harassment as crimes. The amendment explicitly makes it a crime to remove or threaten to remove a person's "religious clothing article or headdress" with the intent to harass, annoy, threaten, or alarm them and be motivated by a belief or perception about the person's:

• Race
• Color
• National Origin
• Ancestry
• Gender
• Gender Identity or Expression
• Religion
• Religious Practice
• Age
• Disability 
• Sexual Orientation

Because such topics are protected classes under the New York State Human Rights Law (protecting against discrimination in employment, housing, and education), the act of the assailant in forcibly removing a person's hijab, turban, kippah, and the like, will render discrimination claims much stronger with the presence of this new law.

Stated otherwise, if you or someone you know has experienced harassment or discrimination related to religious attire, this new law provides a clear path for seeking justice—don’t hesitate to take action and protect your rights.

Restaurant Food Delivery Sanitary Inspection Grade Disclosure Law

Starting on March 25, 2025, a new law (A00028) requires restaurants that provide food deliveries through a website or mobile application to post a hyperlink to the restaurant’s sanitary inspection grades.

The law applies to "internet-based food delivery service providers," including not only restaurants offering deliveries online, but also third-party mobile applications/websites that coordinate food deliveries to customers of restaurants.

This law includes a civil monetary penalty for violations. 

New York Simplifies Notary Rules, Streamlining Cross-State Deals

New York has passed a new law, Bill S2271, that simplifies the recognition of out-of-state notarizations, making it easier for businesses and individuals to transact business across state lines.

Previously, New York required a "certificate of conformity" to verify that out-of-state notarizations complied with the laws of the other state. This extra step created delays and added costs for transactions. Under the new law, the signatures and titles of authorized out-of-state notaries now serve as conclusive proof of their authority. 

In simple terms, if a document is notarized according to the laws of another state, it will be treated as valid in New York without additional verification.

By eliminating these unnecessary hurdles, the law streamlines cross-state transactions, saving time and money. Businesses can now operate more efficiently across state lines, while individuals benefit from smoother processes when buying property, signing contracts, or managing other legal matters.

The law is effective immediately, offering instant relief to those dealing with cross-state paperwork. Whether you’re a business professional or a consumer, this change makes interstate transactions easier, less expensive, and more efficient. 

Learn about the author of this post

Discriminatory Tenant-Screening Tool Results in $2.275MM Payment

On November 20, 2024, the Honorable Angel Kelley of the United States District Court of Massachusetts issued a Final Approval Order for a $2.275 million settlement involving SafeRent Solutions, LLC ("SafeRent"). In the lawsuit, it was alleged that SafeRent's tenant-screening algorithm was used to evaluate rental applicants where it disproportionately disadvantaged housing voucher recipients, particularly Black and Hispanic applicants. 

Under the settlement, SafeRent committed to:

• No longer use unvalidated scoring models for applicants with housing vouchers unless validated by organizations like the National Fair Housing Alliance.
• Educate landlords on the differences between its scoring models and the implications for housing voucher applicants.

In addition, SafeRent will pay $1.175 million into a settlement fund for affected applicants and $1.1 million for attorneys’ fees. Moreover, landlords using SafeRent’s screening products must certify whether applicants are housing voucher recipients. If certification isn’t provided, tenant-screening scores will be excluded.

For those using tenant-screening services, this case highlights the risks of relying on AI-driven tools without thoroughly understanding or auditing the impact of these tools. Algorithms that inadvertently reinforce biases, whether based on income, race, or other protected characteristics, could lead to significant legal and financial liabilities under the Fair Housing Act and state and local anti-discrimination laws.

Landlords and PropTech should conduct regular audits by trusted third-party validators to avoid discrimination as technology rapidly emerges in this field.

Landlords and PropTech should take this case as motivation to review your screening process, including:

• Do your tools account for biases in their data or design?
• Are they validated for compliance with anti-discrimination laws?
• Are you confident they don’t inadvertently exclude protected groups?

As SafeRent’s case demonstrates, the stakes are high. It’s not just about avoiding lawsuits, it’s about ensuring equitable access to housing and fostering trust in the rental process. Invest in a third-party audit of the AI tools you use, update your policies, and ensure your practices align with Federal, State, and Local fair housing laws. 

Amazon's Exposure to Failure-to-Accommodate Claims Based on New Reasonable Accommodation Policy

Amazon recently updated its Reasonable Accommodation Policy as to employees seeking disability accommodations to work from home.  

Here is an explanation of their updated policy based on Bloomberg Reports. 

In a nutshell, the policy includes a more rigorous vetting process, multilevel leader review, and month-long return to the office trials. 

As a result, Amazon may wind-up defending more failure-to-accommodate claims while enacting this policy update. Specifically, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requires employers to provide reasonable accommodations unless doing so would cause an undue hardship. The ADA mandates that employers engage in an interactive process, assessing requests individually in a timely manner. By implementing a more complex approval system, Amazon may be making it harder for employees with disabilities to receive the accommodations that they need, potentially violating the ADA. 

First, the new process requires a complex "multilevel leader review," which could lead to significant delays before employees' requests are approved. This extended waiting period could violate the ADA's requirement to address requests for accommodations in a timely manner, which is seen as a constructive denial of the requested accommodation that makes a failure-to-accommodate lawsuit ripe for adjudication. 

Additionally, the policy is problematic because it applies to both new requests and extensions of existing accommodations. Employees who have already been granted accommodations may now be required to return to the office for month-long trials to assess whether their needs are being met. This one-size-fits-all approach may not be suitable for all disabilities, and pushing employees back to the office without considering their specific needs could be seen as a failure to provide reasonable accommodation in violation of the ADA.

If employees are unable to obtain the accommodations they require and are forced to work in ways that don’t suit their disabilities, they may feel forced to leave the company. In such cases, this could be considered constructive discharge, where the work environment becomes so intolerable that employees feel they have no choice but to quit.

If Amazon's new policy fails to comply with the ADA or similar state and local laws, it could face serious legal consequences. Affected employees should file complaints with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), which is a condition precedent to bringing an ADA claim. Remember, dependent on location, such a charge must be filed with EEOC in as early as 180 days (some states extend this to 300 days, but federal sector employees only have 45 days to contact an EEO Counselor to get the ball rolling). 

Amazon's actions highlight the need for employers to carefully balance workplace goals with their legal obligations to uphold disability rights under federal, state, and local laws.

NYC’s Rental Game-Changer: New Law Shifts Broker Fees to Landlords

The New York City Council has approved the FARE Act (Int 0360-2024), a new bill that eliminates upfront broker fees for most renters. 

Currently, New York is one of the only places in the country where tenants are required to pay these fees, often around 15% of the yearly rent, even when they’ve never met the broker. This has meant an average upfront cost of $13,000 for renters, which includes broker fees, security deposits, and first month’s rent. Under the FARE Act, the responsibility for paying the broker fee will shift to the party that hires the broker - usually the landlord or building manager—unless the tenant specifically hires the broker. 

The bill passed with solid support, at 42 votes to 8. Proponents argue it’s common sense that the party hiring the broker should pay for their services, adding that the FARE Act will help make housing more accessible for working- and middle-income renters. However, critics, including the Real Estate Board of New York (REBNY), have raised concerns that the law could lead to higher rents, make it more difficult to find housing, and harm brokers.

The mayor has until December 13, 2024 to sign the FARE Act, after which it becomes law and takes effect 180 days later. 

Stay tuned to see how the FARE Act impacts the NYC rental scene. For better or worse, it's sure to be a game changer. 

EEOC's New Affirmative Action Guidance Heightens Employer Risk for Reverse Discrimination Suits Post-SCOTUS Harvard Decision

Andrew Lieb Published in NYSBA Journal Stride from the Committee on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion: EEOC's New Affirmative Action Guidance Heightens Employer Risk for Reverse Discrimination Suits Post-SCOTUS Harvard Decision.

https://liebatlaw.com/Material/publication/Stride_Fall%202024.pdf 

FTC “Click-to-Cancel” Rule - Mandatory Way to End Recurring Subscriptions and Memberships

On April 14, 2025 there will be no more of the never ending loop of frustration in trying to cancel your recurring subscriptions and memberships. The Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") has issued its finalized "Click to Cancel" rule, making it simpler for consumers to cancel recurring subscriptions. 

This rule targets those frustrating hurdles that consumers face to unsubscribe from services like streaming platforms and subscription boxes. In the past companies often required phone calls, long forms, or multiple steps for cancellations, even though signing up was easy with just a few clicks. This new rule ensures that if a business offers an online option to subscribe, they must also offer an easy online option to cancel in a similar manner. 

Businesses must now provide a clear, direct path for cancellation and requires companies to offer annual reminders of subscription renewals and to communicate any changes clearly to consumers. If a company proposes additional offers, alternatives, or incentives for consumers who are considering cancellation, the consumer must be able to decline those offers and proceed to cancel without additional hurdles. Check out the FTC's fact sheet here, which summarizes this new rule. 

This rule is the result of the thousands of complaints the FTC has received about recurring subscription practices each year. This rule will now provide a consistent legal framework by prohibiting companies from:

1. Misrepresenting any material fact made while marketing goods or services with a recurring subscription feature;
2. Failing to clearly and conspicuously disclose material terms prior to obtaining a consumer’s billing information in connection with a recurring subscription feature;
3. Failing to obtain a consumer’s express informed consent to the recurring subscription feature before charging the consumer; and
4. Failing to provide a simple mechanism to cancel the recurring subscription feature and immediately halt charges.

Violating the FTC’s new rule comes with a $51,744 civil penalty, injunctive relief, rescission or reformation of contracts that violate the Click-to-Cancel Rule, refund of money or return of property, the payment of damages, and public notification of the violation. Plus, there is additional exposure for state specific unfair or deceptive act or practice laws, such as NY General Business Law 349 for attorneys' fees and statutory penalties of $1,000 per violation. 

For more details, you can view the FTC's official release here. 

Brick-and-Mortar Businesses Without Accessibility Features on Websites Will Continue to Get Sued

A recent Federal Case highlights why businesses with physical locations must make sure that their websites are accessible to people with disabilities (e.g., screen readers).

Jose Mejia, who is legally blind, sued High Brew Coffee after their website prevented him from using his screen-reading software, making it impossible for him to complete his purchase. He claimed this was disability discrimination under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA” or “Title III”), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in places of public accommodation. (42 U.S.C. § 12182(a)).

Mejia claimed that accessibility issues with High Brew’s website constitute disability discrimination under Title III, as they prevented him from shopping as a sighted customer would. High Brew argued that because its website wasn’t tied to a physical location, it didn’t count. The Court sided with High Brew, ruling that websites without a physical counterpart aren’t subject to Title III in New York.

The opinion is a reminder that businesses with both websites and physical locations are still exposed to a discrimination case. This means that if your company operates a website tied to a physical store, you may face legal repercussions if it does not comply with accessibility standards. It's important to note that, while not available under Title III, emotional distress damages - that’s fancy lawyer talk for potential big bucks - are recoverable under the New York State Human Rights Law, Executive Law § 296(2)(a), and New York City Human Rights Law, New York City, N.Y., Code § 8-107(4) in these cases.

And for anyone like Mejia who has run into accessibility barriers on a website connected to a physical location, it’s worth contacting an attorney. You may have a case under the ADA & New York laws that protect against disability discrimination.

National Disability Employment Awareness Month - Are Your Accommodation Rights Being Violated?

On September 30, 2024, President Biden officially proclaimed October as National Disability Employment Awareness Month while promoting inclusive workplaces. 

This year's focus is advancing access and inclusion which aligns with the core principles of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The ADA eliminated the barriers individuals with disabilities faces, including employment. The ADA requires employers to provide reasonable accommodations and ensure that job opportunities are accessible to those with disabilities. This allows the over 61 million Americans living with a disability the opportunity to be included, participate, and be respected in the workforce.  

Remember, employers don't have a choice; if an accommodation is wrongfully denied, the employee can sue for back pay, front pay, emotional distress damages, punitive damages and attorneys' fees. 

If you'd like to read President Biden's proclamation, click here. 

National Guard Leave & Employment Protection in NYS Signed into Law

Effective on 9/27/2024, a new NYS law, A3710, extends employment protections to all active duty members of the national guard.

The law's justification explains the need for the law, as follows: "The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act does not apply when a National Guard member is called up by the governor to serve state active duty to respond to state emergencies such as fires, hurricanes, tornadoes, and floods."

Under the law, service members are guaranteed re-employment in the same position or a position of similar prestige and pay, unless it is impossible or unreasonable for the employer to offer this.

Active duty national guard members called into service by NYS or another state must apply for re-employment within 90 days after being relieved from such service.

The law provides for compensation of lost wages and benefits if an employer breaches the law.

EEOC's Disabled Federal Employee Retention Report - Discrimination Issues Lower Job Retention

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) released a Retention of Disabled Employee Report with recommendations for federal agencies to improve retention of disabled employees in federal public sector jobs.

The Report is based on 3 years of data & recommends that Fed Agencies should have: 

1. Disability accommodation procedures that comply with federal law;
2. Compliance procedures for processing personal assistance services requests; & 
3. Systems for processing such requests & publicizing them to employees & applicants on their website.

Importantly, the Report highlights the need for reasonable accommodations to not be denied for costs & if denied, the employee should be notified of the reason for the denial & their rights. 

In contrast, the Report found that Fed Agencies that focused on personal assistance services and reasonable accommodations had better employee retention.