Attorney Andrew Lieb recently shared key insights on Scripps News on former President Trump's defense strategy following his arraignment. Lieb's analysis sheds light on important arguments and potential challenges that may arise in the case. Let's explore the crucial points discussed during the interview.

1. Selective Prosecution and Relevancy:

Lieb notes that Trump's references to other investigations, such as those involving Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden, may hold political weight but lack the relevancy required to be heard in a courtroom. Selective prosecution may be raised as a defense, but its success remains unlikely.

2. Fourth Amendment and Unreasonable Search and Seizures:

Trump's defense may challenge the legality of the FBI raid on his Mar-a-Lago home, arguing violations of the Fourth Amendment. However, Lieb suggests the experienced prosecution team is unlikely to have made critical mistakes in obtaining the subpoena.

3. Personal vs. Official Records:

Trump's claim to distinguish personal and official records presents an intriguing argument because of the Clinton Sock Drawer Case. However, legal precedent from the Court of Appeals limits a president's authority in determining record categorization under the Presidential Records Act. This argument may face challenges and potential appeals.

4. Motions, Appeals, and Bond Conditions:

Lieb outlines three expected motions: discovery of evidence, suppression based on Fourth Amendment violations, and dismissal based on record categorization as personal. Appeals are likely to complicate the case further. Violating bond conditions, including communicating with witnesses, may result in consequences for Trump's bond.

Attorney Andrew Lieb recently delivered a comprehensive legal interpretation during his appearance on Scripps News, offering deep insights into the indictment case against former President Trump. Here are the key takeaways from his commentary:

The Importance of Discovery:

According to Lieb, the stage of litigation following arraignment will be an approximate year-long discovery. Discovery is an information exchange process where the defense counsel has the right to view what the evidence supporting the prosecutor's case, allowing them to prepare their defense based on the evidence at hand.

Anticipated Motions: 

In the context of this case, Lieb predicts a series of motions to suppress and dismiss the evidence presented by the prosecutors. This process of challenging the evidence is critical for the defense in ensuring any evidence used in the trial is obtained properly and is relevant.

Role of the Defense Team:

Lieb believes the defense team's immediate task should be to take charge of the case, turning it from a political show into a serious criminal defense case. This involves ensuring their client refrains from making potentially damaging public speeches and focusing on evaluating the evidence at hand.

Fourth Amendment Implications:

Lieb noted that improper acquisition of evidence could lead to motions for suppression based on Fourth Amendment rights, which protect against unreasonable searches and seizures. This approach could potentially impact what evidence is deemed admissible in the trial.

Implications for Future Proceedings:

As the case unfolds, Lieb anticipates many of the decisions made by the judge to be appealed to the 11th circuit, which may set precedent for future high-profile cases.

In a recent interview with LiveNow from Fox, Andrew Lieb, an attorney at Lieb at Law, offered insight into former President Donald Trump's federal arraignment. The case at hand revolves around accusations that Trump misused classified documents and obstructed justice.

Lieb explained that the investigation was being led by Special Counsel Jack Smith, appointed by Attorney General Merrick Garland. The probe's scope includes an examination of Trump's handling of classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate and the events of January 6th. However, the current arraignment focuses solely on the former.

While the investigation began under Judge Canon, the arraignment itself will be overseen by Magistrate Judge Goodman. The chief contention is what Trump did with classified documents after leaving office, including his alleged obstruction of returning these documents and the potential violation of the Espionage Act.

Trump reportedly paid someone to record conversations in which he acknowledged the classified status of certain documents. This revelation is a significant component of the indictment. The maximum penalty for these charges amounts to 400 years, although Lieb was clear to specify that this is a theoretical maximum, not a sentencing guideline.

The arraignment process was outlined as a relatively straightforward procedure. It typically involves the entry of a plea, and in Trump's case, the expectation is a plea of not guilty. However, the process of capturing images and video will be heavily restricted within federal court, and there will be no mug shots due to perceived security risks.

Moving forward, Lieb anticipates Trump will face trial, and given federal prosecutors' historically high conviction rates, he sees it likely that the former President could face prison time. It’s also worth noting that this arraignment is only one part of several potential legal issues for Trump, with potential grand jury proceedings in DC and investigations in Georgia yet to play out.

Addressing the crowds gathered outside the courthouse, Lieb expressed hopes for peaceful protests. He reiterated that it's essential for the judiciary to run its course without violent interruption, regardless of public opinion. He pointed out that Trump would have a jury largely composed of his peers in Florida, a state with a Republican majority.

In a follow-up interview with LiveNOW from Fox, Attorney Andrew Lieb delved deeper into the unprecedented indictment of former President Donald Trump. As the initial shock of the news subsided, Lieb was able to provide a more nuanced analysis of the charges and their potential implications on Trump's future political pursuits.

Breaking Down the Charges:

The charges brought against Trump are severe, ranging from allegations of willful retention of National Defense Information to accusations of making false statements, conspiracy, and concealment. Lieb laid out the possible consequences of these allegations, emphasizing that these charges are substantial and carry potential prison sentences.

Trump's Political and Personal Predicament:

Lieb examined Trump's response to the indictments, characterizing the former President as being caught between his political messaging and his need for self-defense. This, according to Lieb, is indicative of the seriousness of the situation and the weight that these legal proceedings place on Trump.

The Impact on Trump's Campaign Activities:

When asked about the possible disruptions these charges could bring to Trump's campaign activities, Lieb clarified that Trump is currently facing two separate indictments, with a third potentially in the pipeline. These charges could significantly impede Trump's campaign schedule. The power to schedule court appearances rests not with the defendant, but with the judges presiding over the cases. As such, Trump could be held in contempt if he fails to attend court sessions as required.

Looking Forward:

Looking ahead, Lieb expressed his anticipation for the full indictment details, which are to be released via the PACER system. Unfortunately, due to the enormous amount of traffic following the news, the system had temporarily crashed.

Lieb also expressed his keen interest in observing Trump's next steps. Will the former president pivot from his current political maneuvers to focus more heavily on his criminal defense? With the seriousness of the charges he faces, it's a transition Lieb suggests might be necessary.

In a recent TV news interview on LiveNOW from Fox, legal analyst Andrew Lieb provided expert analysis and insights into the indictment of former President Donald Trump. Lieb's comments shed light on the significance of the indictment and the potential implications for the former president and the country, based on how the case shakes out.  

Lieb emphasized the gravity of the situation, stating, "It's a somber day. It's an overwhelming day. We have a former president being indicted on federal charges. This isn't just a state coming after him. This is these United States." He further speculated about the possibility of additional indictments in Washington, D.C., indicating that the legal proceedings surrounding Trump are far from over.

Regarding Trump's approach to the indictment, Lieb commented on his previous inaccurate statements and urged him to focus on his defense rather than political messaging and fundraising. "The first reaction you have when facing a federal indictment is not how to run for office or raise money. The first reaction you have is how to keep your mouth quiet, go with innocence, and convince them that you are not someone who is guilty," Lieb advised.

Lieb acknowledged the concerns raised by Trump supporters about potential political interference, but emphasized the importance of upholding the principle that no one is above the law. "Whether the most liberal Democrat or the most conservative Republican, we need to understand that this is a momentous, big day that we should all remember. This day does matter," he stated.

Discussing the historic nature of the indictment, Lieb underscored the significance of a former president facing federal charges, stating, "Anyone who does anything wrong can get indicted."

Lieb expressed confidence in the prosecution team led by special counsel Jack Smith, highlighting Smith's reputation and the need for rock-solid evidence to ensure a successful case. "If Jack Smith loses this case, the legitimacy of our Justice Department is out the window," Lieb warned.

The interview concluded with Lieb addressing the potential political implications in an election year, emphasizing the importance of strong evidence to dispel doubts about the case's legitimacy. He also stressed the need for politicians to be held accountable for their actions, stating, "We have serious problems if people running for president become immune from prosecution if they committed crimes."

Andrew Lieb, a renowned constitutional attorney, was recently invited to provide expert commentary on Scripps News regarding the groundbreaking indictments of former President Donald Trump in Florida and Washington DC. The charges range from mishandling classified documents to violating the Espionage Act.

Lieb described the indictments as shocking due to their sheer magnitude. He highlighted that the incident marked a significant moment in U.S. history, where a former president was facing legal scrutiny on this scale. 

He also addressed House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy's public backlash against the indictment, which he deemed as a severe injustice and an unprecedented politicization of the judiciary.

According to Lieb, it is essential to appreciate that no one, including a former president, is above the law. At the same time, he noted that the case could set a precedent where potential public office candidates must maintain impeccable records to avoid similar legal scrutiny.

Lieb underlined the potential political implications of the indictment, suggesting that while it could benefit Trump in terms of visibility and fundraising amidst a crowded nomination field, the former president should prioritize his legal defense over political aspirations due to the severity of the charges.

The attorney eloquently captured the dilemma many Americans are currently grappling with: the desire for the rule of law to prevail versus the fear of potential political witch-hunts. In Lieb's view, the resolution of this case could significantly impact public trust in our judicial system and the very foundations of our democracy.

As the landscape of anti-discrimination law continues to evolve, New York's Labor Law Section 201-g has seen significant updates that employers / employees should be aware of.  

The updates, which are encompassed in a  Model Sexual Harassment Prevention Policy, aim to strengthen workplace protections and foster a safe environment for all employees. New York employers must adopt the model policy or create their own sexual harassment prevention policies that meet or exceed state standards. They are also obligated to provide employees with annual sexual harassment prevention training. 

Let's take a closer look at the key changes:

1. Expanded Definition of "Sexual Harassment:

The new policy broadens the definition of sexual harassment to include harassment based on gender, gender identity, gender expression, or sexual orientation. It recognizes that harassment doesn't have to be of a sexual nature, emphasizing that any form of harassment related to these characteristics constitutes sexual harassment. Furthermore, the policy defines important terms such as "cisgender," "transgender," and "non-binary" to ensure a comprehensive understanding.

2. Updated Standards:

Previously, proving a claim of sexual harassment required demonstrating that the conduct was "severe and pervasive." However, the updated policy aligns with the law's 2019 amendments which eliminated this strict standard. Instead, it emphasizes that New York plaintiffs need only show they experienced inferior treatment compared to others based on protected class membership, similar to the standards set by the New York City Human Rights Law.

3. Virtual and Hybrid Workspaces - A New Frontier of Harassment:

The updates in the law recognize the rise of virtual and hybrid workspaces, providing examples to illustrate what constitutes harassment in these contexts. In a world where many employees continue to work remotely, it's crucial for employers to understand and address harassment that may occur outside of the physical office. This includes unwelcome comments or behaviors in virtual meetings and messaging apps, among other things.

4. Universal Application Across Discrimination Types:

The law clarifies that the policy applies equally to all forms of discrimination based on other characteristics, such as race, age, religion, disability, or sexual orientation. It underlines the fundamental principle that all employees should be free from any form of discrimination, regardless of its nature. The reporting and investigation procedures for other forms of discrimination are aligned with those for sexual harassment, ensuring consistent treatment and protection across all protected classes.

5. Interplay Between Sex and Other Protected Characteristics:

The revised law offers examples showing how sexual harassment can intersect with other forms of discrimination. These instances are crucial for employers to understand as they illustrate complex situations where employees might be subjected to discrimination based on multiple protected characteristics simultaneously. 

6. Third-Party Intervention: A Key Role:

One key update emphasizes third-party intervention in instances of perceived harassment or discrimination. The policy provides a clear set of five steps that bystanders can take to intervene and support those affected, including interrupting the harassment, seeking help from a third party, making a record of the incident, checking in on the target, and confronting the harasser. This change underscores the collective responsibility within organizations to maintain a respectful and inclusive work environment. 

7. Strengthened Retaliation Protections:

The policy's retaliation section now explicitly lists examples of retaliatory actions, including disparagement on social media platforms. Importantly, employees are protected from retaliation even if the alleged conduct is not ultimately deemed unlawful, provided they had a good faith belief that it was. This provision encourages a safe reporting environment for all individuals.

8. The Responsibility of Supervisors:

Supervisors play a critical role in maintaining a harassment-free workplace. The updated policy emphasizes that supervisors must not wait for a formal complaint before reporting incidents of harassment. It highlights their duty to offer accommodations to victims and highlights the potential disciplinary consequences for supervisors who fail to report known instances of harassment. 

Streamlined Complaint and Investigation Process:

The new policy streamlines the complaint and investigation process, with an emphasis on promptness. Investigations should be initiated and completed as soon as possible. Additionally, employees are no longer required to submit complaints solely through the policy's complaint form; they can report incidents orally or in other written forms such as emails.

The revised sexual harassment prevention policy in New York State signifies a crucial step forward in creating safer and more inclusive workplaces. By familiarizing themselves with these changes, employers and employees can contribute to a work environment free from discrimination.

The state's taxpayer whistleblower law was recently expanded by Part DD of S4009C, the state budget, and employers should be nervous because now employees can bring lawsuits on suspicion that their employer evaded their tax obligations. 

The whistleblower law, which is formally called The New York False Claims Act (FCA), allows whistleblowers to bring suits against individuals and entities that knowingly submit deceptive claims to the government, including tax fraud. Initially, claimants were limited to individuals with specific knowledge of the taxpayer's preparation process. However, as amended under S4009C, New York State Finance Law Art. 13 §189-h now enables claims against individuals or entities who deliberately evade tax obligations where claims can be advanced solely on suspicions. 

Given that the FCA allows whistleblowers to recover monetary damages of 30 percent of the government's recovery and that the government can recover three times the loss sustained by the state, it bodes to reason that disgruntled employees are quite incentivized to bring claims in selling out their employers. 

The amendment permits claims on tax concealments from May 3, 2020, but does not allow raising retroactive claims in pending cases. Individuals and business entities should immediately reassess their filing obligations and be clear on which employees have access to their records. 

As amended, the FCA is very likely to shake up the dynamic between bosses and employees. With enticing financial incentives on the line for successful whistleblowing claims, things are about to get interesting. 

In an interview with Scripps News, Attorney Andrew Lieb discussed the court decision finding Alabama's congressional map in violation of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Lieb provided insights on the implications of the ruling, highlighting its significance for voting rights in Alabama and nationwide.

The Impact on Voting Rights:

Lieb emphasized that the ruling is based on the 15th Amendment, an anti-discrimination law. The court found the district boundaries to be discriminatory, allowing only one African-American majority district. This decision reinforces the need to protect voting rights and prevent discrimination.

A Shift in the Supreme Court:

Lieb discussed Chief Justice John Roberts' role in the Supreme Court. Roberts aims to maintain the court's legitimacy by standing against discrimination. This decision represents his attempt to reassert influence and promote a balanced approach within the court.

Attorney Andrew Lieb passionately reflects on the enduring discussions surrounding discrimination laws, acknowledging the difficulty of empathizing with others' experiences. He emphasizes the importance of anti-discrimination laws and encourages a discourse centered around supporting one another. Lieb calls for unity, urging a departure from tribal politics and envisioning a future where discrimination is eradicated.

This Newsweek article covers the ongoing legal troubles of former President Donald Trump, focusing on the recent testimony of his Chief of Staff, Mark Meadows. As part of two federal investigations into Trump, Meadows was subpoenaed and reportedly answered questions possibly regarding Trump's attempts to overturn the 2020 election results, his actions surrounding the January 6 Capitol riot, and his retention of classified documents. Attorney Andrew Lieb suggests this could spell bad news for Trump, particularly if Meadows did not plead the Fifth Amendment because he managed to secure an immunity deal. This event follows other legal hits Trump has received, including being charged with 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in NY and being found liable in a civil sexual abuse case. 

Legal and political analyst Andrew Lieb reads significance into Meadows' testimony, suggesting that the absence of a Fifth Amendment plea and a possible immunity deal could prove damaging for Trump.

According to Lieb, Meadows, being a central figure in the White House at the time of the controversial events could provide key insights that could implicate Trump in serious charges, such as seditious conspiracy related to the January 6 incident.

Read the full article in Newsweek Here. https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-mark-meadows-testify-jan6-1805007

In a recent interview on Live NOW from FOX, legal analyst and Attorney Andrew Lieb offered in-depth commentary about the possibility of Donald Trump's indictment happening this week in both DC and FL concerning the mishandling of classified documents.

Indictment Tea Leaves:

Lieb indicated that Trump's recent meeting with the DOJ signals an imminent indictment. He stated, "defense attorneys often will come in and meet with the prosecutor" before an indictment, and Trump's recent social media posts also suggest he believes an indictment is pending.

Political Magician Trump:

Lieb praised Trump as a "political magician" who might use a potential indictment to fuel political allegiance and fundraising efforts. However, he cautioned that this tactic could backfire in his criminal defense.

Two Different Games:

While discussing Trump's ongoing legal issues, Lieb stressed the distinction between state and federal charges, noting a presidential pardon wouldn't affect the New York case.

On Gag Orders:

Responding to inquiries about a potential gag order, Lieb said he doesn't believe one would be issued in either this case or the Manhattan one beyond the confidentiality order that already exists in NY. He did warn that Trump's tendency to speak openly might push the courts towards considering a gag order.

The Special Counsel's Options:

Lieb explained that Special Counsel Jack Smith could opt to write a report instead of indicting Trump. However, given the grand juries convening in both DC and FL, Lieb predicts an indictment is on the horizon.

Multiple Grand Juries:

When questioned about multiple grand juries, Lieb clarified it's due to alleged crimes occurring in different locations. This strategic approach would prevent the case from being relocated.

Effects on Other Political Figures:

Finally, Lieb lauded former Vice President Mike Pence's cooperation during his investigation, contrasting it with Trump's resistance. He noted Pence's respect and compliance could serve as a model for anyone facing similar situations.

Attorney Andrew Lieb recently provided his expertise in a compelling interview with Newsweek, focusing on the intense feud between Governor Ron DeSantis of Florida and Governor Gavin Newsom of California. The discussion delved into the possibility of DeSantis facing kidnapping charges.

Lieb shed light on the protective nature of the Doctrine of Absolute Immunity, which safeguards governors from prosecution, even if their actions are perceived as malicious or in bad faith. Additionally, he emphasized the significance of the Doctrine of Comity, which mandates states to honor and respect the laws and judicial decisions of other states. These legal principles act as a safeguard, ensuring that DeSantis is shielded from charges, regardless of the circumstances.

Of particular interest, Lieb explored the potential implications if Governor Newsom were to disregard the Doctrine of Comity and pursue charges against DeSantis. He underscored the gravity of such a situation, cautioning against the consequences that could arise from one state openly defying the laws and legal decisions of another state. The nation could be at risk of teetering on the edge of a civil war, with severe repercussions and unprecedented chaos.

The full article from Newsweek can be found here: https://www.newsweek.com/ron-desantis-kidnapping-migrants-gavin-newsom-1804958

In a recent TV interview on Live NOW from FOX, legal analyst Attorney Andrew Lieb provided insightful analysis into the meeting between former President Donald Trump's legal team and Department of Justice (DOJ) officials. The conversation revolved around the potential charging decision that could significantly impact Trump's future and the unprecedented nature of this event in American history. 

Rumblings of Imminent Charging Decisions:

Lieb acknowledged the rumors surrounding imminent charging decisions in both Florida and Washington, D.C., with grand juries present in both locations. He stressed the seriousness of the crimes Trump could be charged with, such as the Espionage Act and Obstruction of Justice. This potential indictment against a former President marks a significant moment in American history, making it an exhausting and sombering experience for many.

Political Fireball vs. Substance:

When questioned about the significance of the meeting, Lieb highlighted the initial letter sent by Trump's legal team, which he described as a political fireball lacking substance. Despite the political nature of the letter, it is customary for defense counsel to meet with prosecutors to present their case. However, Lieb expressed doubts about the effectiveness of Trump's approach, as the political tone of the letter may have hindered a more factual and productive discussion.

Trump's Social Media Posts and Expectations:

Lieb addressed Trump's recent all-caps post on social media, indicating that Trump believes that he will be charged. While it would be unlikely for the DOJ officials to reveal such information during the meeting, Lieb advised Trump to exercise caution and to avoid inflaming the prosecutor. Restraint and silence, he emphasized, would be a more strategic approach when facing potential criminal problems.

Pence's Cooperation and Lessons Learned:

The interview shifted focus to former Vice President Mike Pence, who cooperated swiftly in the investigation, resulting in the DOJ's decision not to charge him. Lieb praised Pence's approach as a model for handling such situations, emphasizing the importance of cooperation and avoiding confrontation with the government.

The Leak and Future Developments:

Looking ahead, Lieb predicted that Trump's team would leak information about any charging decision, considering Trump's tendency to exploit such news for political and fundraising purposes. He anticipated that the announcement could come as early as the following week, revealing the charges Trump may face.

Uncharted Territory:

The interview concluded with an examination of the historical significance of potentially indicting a former President. Lieb emphasized that if Special Counsel Jack Smith were to indict Trump, it would mark the second pending indictment against a former president who currently leads the GOP nomination race—an unprecedented scenario in American politics. Lieb reminded the audience that the significance of both federal and state charges should not be underestimated, as state charges cannot be pardoned by the President alone.

Attorney Andrew Lieb recently made an appearance in an in-depth interview with Scripps News to discuss the potential legal implications for former President Donald Trump over reported classified document discussions, on tape, at his NJ Golf Course. 

Discussing Trump's defense strategy, Lieb clarified that it's not a legal strategy yet a political strategy to run for office. The legal strategy should be to keep quiet and suppress evidence. 

Trump's Legal Showdown: Gag Order or Protective Measure? Attorney Andrew Lieb Spills the Truth 👀⚖️

Attorney Andrew Lieb joined NBC LX, discussing the complex case of Idaho murder suspect, Bryan Kohberger. We delved into the meaning of 'standing silent' as a plea, the challenging dynamics of suborning perjury, and the gravity of the death penalty decision in light of Idaho's reinstated firing squad.