FOX LiveNOW: Attorney Andrew Lieb on Giuliani, Trump, and Republican Debate

During a recent interview on LiveNOW from FOX, legal expert Andrew Lieb discussed the ongoing criminal charges involving Rudy Giuliani, Donald Trump, along with that investigation's impact on the Republican Debate. Here's a summary of the key points:

• Prior to his arrest, a $150K bond amount for Giuliani was agreed upon through a "consent" process.
• Trump is entangled in various legal battles, one of which is in Georgia, where he's accused of running a "criminal enterprise" to challenge the 2020 election results using false claims and pressuring officials.
• The Georgia trial will be broadcasted, allowing the public to observe the proceedings without bias.
• A recent document submission by Jack Smith suggests that the investigation in DC has led to a new witness, referred to as "employee 4," who decided to cooperate after seeking independent legal advice.

Lieb commented on the cases' gravity, stating, "The felonies being discussed come with significant jail time... In terms of evidence, there's conclusive proof in the Florida case."

NYS Adds Protections to State's Human Rights Law (Anti-Discrimination Law)

On August 23, 2023, Gov Hochul signed A7355 and added protections for gender identity or expression to the New York State Human Rights Law (Executive Law 296-c) with respect to unpaid interns. 

FOX LiveNOW: Political Commentator Andrew Lieb Analyzes Trump Surrender

Attorney Andrew Lieb joins LIVENOW from FOX to discuss the latest legal and political updates for Donald Trump. Trump faces 91 felony charges across 4 jurisdictions - New York, DC, Florida, and Georgia. 

• Andrew Lieb predicts the charges in Florida have the most full-proof evidence against Trump, where Trump is recorded admitting documents were not declassified and showing classified documents to others, including war plans with Iran. 
• "Flipping" witnesses who make deals for immunity or lesser charges in exchange for testimony against others will be key. An IT employee at Mar-a-Lago has already "flipped" and says they were told to delete security footage.
• The cases against Trump could take years to play out through trials and appeals. Picking a jury for the RICO case alone may take 6 months.
• Trump may try to delay proceedings until a potential 2024 presidential run, but he'll have trouble campaigning while in court. Lieb thinks Trump will eventually take a plea deal if co-defendants flip.

"Statistically speaking, if I said, our friend, Rachel had 91 charges against her, it's not statistically probable that she's gonna get acquitted on all 91 of them." - Andrew Lieb

FOX LiveNOW: Attorney Andrew Lieb Discusses Kai Cenat Case and Social Media Responsibility

Attorney Andrew Lieb provides insight into the arraignment of Twitch streamer Kai Cenat, who faces charges for inciting a riot after a large crowd gathered for a PlayStation giveaway. Lieb explains what to expect from the legal process and notes that intent is not required for one of the charges. He emphasizes the importance of understanding applicable laws, obtaining proper permits, and having security when hosting large public events. Lieb also comments on the "two-tiered justice system" and how wealth can impact legal representation. 

Scripps News: Attorney Andrew Lieb Breaking Down GA Election Interference Indictment

Attorney Andrew Lieb joins Scripps News to analyze the biggest legal threat facing former President Trump in the Georgia election interference indictment. Lieb discusses how the RICO charges allow prosecutors to present a cohesive narrative to the jury, showing the defendants had an overall purpose to overturn the election results. He also explains how the inclusion of the word "fraud" in the indictment demonstrates this went beyond just words or politics, involving real forged documents and impersonation, making it difficult for the defense to claim this was just a protest with First Amendment protections.

Understanding Your Rights: Service Dogs, Discrimination, and the Law

Service dogs play a pivotal role in the lives of many individuals with disabilities, acting as their lifeline in countless situations. Given their importance, it's crucial for people to know their rights when it comes to these trained companions, especially in places of public accommodation and housing. Understanding the legal landscape surrounding service dogs is vital. Those with disabilities deserve to live without fear of discrimination, and it's imperative for facilities and establishments to understand and respect their rights.

The Legal Background:

By way of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Fair Housing Act (FHA), service dogs are widely acknowledged as reasonable accommodations for those with statutorily recognized disabilities. This recognition extends across the nation, covering a range of establishments, both public and private.

Should anyone find themselves denied these rights, they can legally bring forth a lawsuit for failure-to-accommodate. The range of potential damages is extensive, from recovery for emotional distress and other compensatory damages (like expenses that arose due to the denial) to punitive damages based on the circumstances and the intent behind the denial. Significantly, victims might be awarded attorneys' fees, ensuring they can secure top-notch representation without bearing the financial burden.

For a successful claim, victims must substantiate five key elements:

1. Proof of a statutorily recognized disability.
2. Evidence that the discriminator knew (or reasonably should have known) about the disability.
3. The asserted accommodation (i.e., the service dog) should not pose undue hardship, making it reasonable.
4. The service animal must directly address the needs of the person with the disability, signifying its necessity.
5. There must have been a denial of the accommodation or a refusal to participate in the interactive process.

It's important to note that state laws can sometimes offer even more protection to victims. For instance, the New York State Human Rights Law expands on the federal definition of disabilities. Unlike federal law, it doesn't demand that an impairment substantially impacts a major life activity to be recognized. Given these intricacies, victims are advised to consult with a discrimination attorney before taking any action, apart from promptly documenting the 6 Ws of Discrimination: Who, What, When, Where, Why, and Witnesses. The process is far from simple.

Service Animal vs. Emotional Support Animal: The Distinction Matters:

It's pertinent to highlight the differentiation between a service animal and an emotional support animal. Under the ADA, this distinction becomes relevant in public places. Yet, under the FHA, both these categories are considered viable reasonable accommodations. Some states, like New York, recognize rights to emotional support animals at public places as well. 

The bone of contention here lies in the inherent definitions. As per the Code of Federal Regulations, a service animal is explicitly trained to execute tasks or perform work benefiting an individual with a disability. This can range from physical and sensory disabilities to psychiatric or intellectual ones. In contrast, emotional support animals don't undergo such specialized training. It's essential to recognize that proving a service animal's training and the necessity of its skills requires evidence.

Relying on a conversation with a representative at the ADA is fraught with risk. The interpretation of the law should be grounded in statutes, regulations, and case law, not someone's subjective opinion. Facilities would do well to engage with their legal counsel in such situations and embark on the 'interactive process' as necessitated by the ADA.

Scripps News: Trump GA Indictment, Analysis with Andrew Lieb - Part 4

In a discussion with Scripps News, Attorney Andrew Lieb delved into the specific allegations against the primary defendants in the Georgia Indictments. Lieb highlighted the intricate nature of the trial, stemming from the significant number of 19 co-defendants. Each defendant's right to a comprehensive defense in court will further complicate the proceedings. The process of selecting an unbiased jury for such a high-profile case could extend over several months. Lieb anticipates this case to be a benchmark in legal prosecutions.

Scripps News: Trump GA Indictment, Analysis with Andrew Lieb - Part 3

Attorney Andrew Lieb returns to Scripps News to provide background on Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis and to discuss the strategy behind her indictment against Donald Trump. Lieb said that it's hard to assess Willis' strategy prior to the release of all the indictments. Lieb also discussed how prosecutors like Jack Smith in DC chose not to indict co-conspirators in order to have a faster case, and that Willis may be pursuing a larger conspiracy case with many defendants based on the number of indictments. 

Scripps News: Trump GA Indictment, Analysis with Andrew Lieb - Part 2

Attorney Andrew Lieb joins Scripps News to discuss our unusual visibility into the indictment process against former President Trump in Georgia. Lieb notes that seeing interactions between the judge and reporters is unusual compared to typical court proceedings in New York. He says this trial could become one of the most "living room" high profile trials since OJ Simpson. Lieb also comments that while Trump's team is attacking the prosecutors, the evidence and facts of the case will be publicly visible, so they can only spin it so much. He says Trump's team needs to hope the evidence works in their favor.

Scripps News: Trump GA Indictment, Analysis with Andrew Lieb - Part 1

In an interview with Scripps News, Attorney Andrew Lieb emphasized the importance of allowing the judicial process to unfold without political interference. He clarified that it is the Grand Jury, a group representing a community's cross-section, that decides on indictments based on presented evidence, not the prosecutors. He stressed the foundational legal principle of "innocent until proven guilty" and argued that claims suggesting violations of free speech in the context of this indictment are not valid legal arguments and would be considered "laughable" in court. Lieb also mentioned that the First Amendment has its boundaries, particularly when it comes to conspiracies or ordering crimes. Furthermore, he noted that arguments based on legal advice might be undermined if the advising lawyers are unindicted co-conspirators or co-defendants.

FOX LiveNOW: Trump Georgia Indictment: What You Need to Know - Analysis with Attorney Andrew Lieb

The Georgia indictment against former President Donald Trump, and his allies, has major implications. Here are the key takeaways from legal analyst Andrew Lieb's breakdown of the case in a recent interview on LiveNOW from FOX.

The indictment alleges a "criminal organization" involving Trump and 18 others related to election interference in Georgia. It includes 19 counts and 98 pages detailing Trump's attempts to overturn the election results in the state. The indictment claims Trump solicited state officials and legislators to change the election outcome.

If convicted, Trump and the others face a minimum sentence of 5 years in prison under Georgia's racketeering statute. Lieb said many of the defendants may turn on each other to avoid jail time.

The case has the potential to restore faith in the justice system because the Georgia court will allow cameras, giving the public a firsthand view of the proceedings. This will be different from other cases against Trump that do not allow cameras.

Newsmax: Attorney Andrew Lieb Talking About Georgia Prosecutors About To File Charges Against Donald Trump.

Attorney Andrew Lieb recently joined Newsmax for Breaking News where he delved into the possible Trump indictment in Georgia, as suggested by certain court filings. 

Lieb highlighted the need for prudence, wherein he stated, "Until we have the full facts from the indictment, jumping to conclusions is premature. Every charge deserves a thorough review before passing judgment."

The potential use of RICO statutes, or Georgia's anti-racketeering law, is under debate. Andrew stressed the fact that details, such as who exactly is indicted or whether RICO was even invoked, are still unclear. He advocates for a wait-and-see approach.

Additionally, Andrew illuminated the distinct reactions to the indictment from legal and political perspectives. Legally speaking, it's crucial to present just the necessary information to prevent a dismissal, but politically a robust speaking indictment would be far better.

New York Post - Attorney Andrew Lieb Interviewed on Workplace Rights / Union Implications

Attorney Andrew Lieb shared insights with the NY Post on workplace rights and union implications. While unions offer protections, they come with legal nuances. Addressing concerns internally, like through HR, is advised, yet unresolved issues may call for legal steps. Strikes, powerful yet consequential, need judicious thought. Lieb delves into factors like "strikes as a last resort" and the importance of a compliant workplace culture.  #WorkplaceRights #UnionConsiderations #LegalInsights #StrikeResponsibly #LiebatLaw #EmployeeAdvocacy #attorneyandrewlieb #employmentlawyer #Sagaftra

https://nypost.com/2023/08/13/fed-up-with-pay-or-working-conditions-youre-not-alone/

FOX LiveNOW: Attorney Andrew Lieb on Trump Protection Order

Attorney Andrew Lieb joined LiveNOW from FOX to analyze Donald Trump's Protection Order.

Today, Trump's legal team fought prosecutors over the scope of a protective order in the January 6 conspiracy case against the former president. A protective order limits what Trump can publicly disclose about evidence and discovery in the case. But Trump argues it restricts his free speech rights as a presidential candidate. The judge will ultimately decide the scope of the order and how strictly Trump must follow it. Violating a protective order can lead to sanctions, fines and even jail time. But handling a case involving a former president and political candidate presents unique challenges. Attorney Lieb believes the judge will show little tolerance if Trump violates it.

FOX LiveNOW: Attorney Andrew Lieb Analyzes SCOTUS' Ghost Guns Decision and Tory Lanez Sentencing

Attorney Andrew Lieb joined LiveNOW from FOX to both offer clarity and insight into the Supreme Court's decision to reinstate the regulation of ghost guns, and to analyze Rapper Tory Lanez' sentencing.  

Ghost Guns: The Supreme Court's 5-4 decision to reinstate the regulation does not indicate a final stance on the regulation's substance. Rather, it's a preservation of the status quo pending appeal. Lieb's legal interpretation suggests that to address the ghost gun issue effectively, Congress might consider legislation to ensure that assembled guns and unassembled kits adhere to the same regulations, simplifying enforcement and closing potential legal loopholes.

The Lanez Conviction: The case of Tory Lanez's shooting of Megan Thee Stallion has legal circles and the public alike dissecting the intricacies of judicial sentencing. The ten-year sentence Lanez received, against the backdrop of the prosecution's 13-year recommendation and the potential 22+ year maximum. A criminal act was committed, and the judicial system delivered a sentence in response to it. 

Newsmax: Attorney Andrew Lieb Defends State Denying Catholic Couple's Foster Application Due to Discrimination on Gender and Sexuality

Attorney Andrew Lieb joins Newsmax to debate with Heritage Foundation attorney about a lawsuit trying to let foster parents discriminate against children's sexual orientation by blaming free speech and religious rights. Lieb argues on behalf of the children from the perspective of the Massachusetts Department of Children and Families in defending the decision to deny the couple's foster application. He cites Massachusetts regulations requiring foster parents to support and affirm the sexual orientation and gender identities of LGBTQ foster children. Lieb claims this policy is needed to ensure vulnerable foster children know that they will be loved no matter who they are because the Constitution guarantees equal protection under the law.

MSNBC: Attorney Andrew Lieb Analyzes Trump's Indictment Allegations + Fake Electoral Scheme

Attorney Andrew Lieb joined MSNBC to dissect the latest charges brought forth against former President Donald Trump by Special Counsel Jack Smith. The in-depth discussion examined the complexities of the alleged fake electoral scheme devised by Trump and his co-conspirators, intending to reverse the 2020 election outcome. Lieb explained the historical precedents of such operations and highlighted how this case deviates. He also evaluated the potential consequences for the "fake electors" and projected what investigators might hope to glean from their testimonies. Beyond this, Lieb delved into Trump's defense strategy, specifically focusing on the invoked First Amendment rights.

MSNBC: Attorney Andrew Lieb Examines Trump's First Amendment Defense on MSNBC

Attorney Andrew Lieb appears on MSNBC to dissect the third indictment lodged against former President Donald Trump. As GOP members widely employ a First Amendment defense, Lieb systematically dismantles these claims by highlighting conspiracy as an exemption to free speech protections, invoking Justice Scalia's ruling in US v. Williams. Lieb underscores that this case transcends mere incitement allegations. Rather, it contends that Trump and his co-conspirators endeavored to manipulate state votes, exerted pressure on former Vice President Pence, and exploit the Capitol violence for their ulterior motives.

CBS NY: Andrew Lieb Talking About Rudy Giuliani Likely First Co-Conspirator In Trump Indictment

Attorney Andrew Lieb joins CBS 2 NY to discuss Rudy Giuliani's as a Co-Conspirator in Trump Indictment. 

FOX LiveNOW: Legal Political Analyst Andrew Lieb Talks About Hunter Biden's Ex Business Partner Devon Archer

Attorney Andrew Lieb reviewed credibility of Devon Archer (Hunter Biden's ex-business partner) on LiveNOW from FOX while considering Archer's fraud conviction. We examined his claims about Joe Biden's role in Hunter's foreign dealings and the potential misuse of VP influence for personal gain. Yet, in allegations of criminality, the burden of proof is crucial. No direct evidence yet. Burden of proof is on the accuser, not the accused.