Sex Offenders & Disclosure Obligation of Real Estate Agents

While teaching agency disclosure, I was recently questioned about the duty of a seller's agent to disclose to prospective purchaser customers whether a sex offender lived in the subject Condominium.

The agent made inquiry pursuant to Real Property Law 443(4)(a) where the statute requires a seller's agent to "disclose all facts known to the agent materially affecting the value or desirability of property, except as otherwise provided by law."

The agent's point was that a sex offender's presence would lower the "desirability of property", if not the "value" of the Condominium unit. It was a good point that the agent made and it stumped me. So I said that I would check some law and let everyone know the answer on this blog.

Here goes - The closest case on point is Glazer v. LoPreste. Therein, a home purchaser sued the seller and real estate agents stating that the seller and agents fraudulently misrepresented that the home was a good place to raise children and concealed the existence of sex offenders in the neighborhood. The Appellate Division (2nd highest Court in the State) held (decided) that there was no rightful claim under these circumstances and dismissed the case.

Glazer is differentiated from the facts presented in that Glazer involved allegations of an affirmative misrepresentation whereas the facts presented only involved a failure of a duty to disclose. However, Glazer involved a sex offender in the neighborhood whereas the question presented involved one living within the same Condominium, which appears to be a heightened situation. Nonetheless, it seems safe for a real estate agent not to disclose the existence of a sex offender in this facts presented because, as the Court stated in Glazer, "the information was not 'peculiarly within the knowledge of the seller or unlikely to be discovered by a prudent purchaser exercising due care with respect to the subject transaction'".

Stated otherwise, the Glazer decision seems to limit the obligations for a real estate agent to disclose to facts that are not generally known nor easily discovered through due care. Meaning, why didn't the purchaser check the sex offender registry for himself?

So, agents, while there is no license law opinion directly on point, it appears that Glazer, while not addressing license law compliance and section 443(4)(a) expressly, would make nondisclosure permissible.

Commercial Space: Municipal use prohibitions prohibited

New York's highest court, the Court of Appeals, ruled earlier this year that "zoning is concerned with the use of land, not with the identity of the user" in the case of Sunrise Check Cashing and Payroll Services, Inc. v. Town of Hempstead. 

What does this mean to commercial landlords and tenants? How should you, a real estate professional, be equipped to now navigate the commercial real estate industry? 

Learn more at the New York Real Estate Journal 

Andrew Lieb receives award from the Bar Association

We are very happy to announce that Andrew Lieb, Esq. received an Award of Recognition from The Suffolk County Bar Association for Chairing the Real Property Committee of the Bar Association.

Child Support and Maintenance as Lien Priority

At our continuing education course, Title Waves, held last week at Chase Plaza, a real estate agent inquired whether child or spousal support (maintenance) received lien priority in the same way that real estate tax liens do.

The answer is that they don't. In fact, a child support or spousal support Order is not even a lien in the first place, much less a prioritized lien. Instead, only after there are arrears and a money judgment concerning those arrears is a lien even possible.

So, in every situation, in order to even receive a lien, a judgment is necessary. To be clear, a judgment for periodic future support payments does not qualify for a lien regardless that the Judge Ordered someone to pay. The lien only arises when a Judge indicates through an Order that the payor is in default.

With respect to lien priority, only real estate tax liens and certain mechanics' liens can skip the general rule of first in time, first in right with respect to lien priority.

However, this is not the end of the discussion. You see, while there is no lien priority with respect to real property for child support and maintenance liens, CPLR 5234(b) does provide for priority with respect to personal property. In fact, the CPLR section states, in pertinent part, that "child support shall have priority over any other assignment, levy or process" with respect to satisfying an execution or order of attachment against a debtor.

So, while there is no lien priority to support obligations with respect to real property (land & structures thereon, such as a house); there is lien priority when a Sheriff sells personal property to satisfy the debt on behalf of the creditor.

Mortgage Foreclosure Alert: New Making Home Affordable Program Handbook Released - Version 4.2

To access the new Handbook for MHA, inclusive of HAMP and HAFA, click here. While reviewing the Handbook you should be aware of the case of Flagstar Bank v. Walker wherein the Court held that the statutory good faith standard for a CPLR 3408 Foreclosure Settlement Conference is compliance with the Handbook. To review the case, click here.

This Handbook is the rules for banks / servicers to modify mortgages, so pay careful attention to detail and make sure that they comply.

President Broker is no more - DOS bans use of corporate titles

This past Friday, the NYS Department of State provided an Opinion Letter stating that the use of corporate titles by real estate agents, who do not actually hold such related authority, is misleading and impermissible.

On Friday evening attorneys and senior management at brokerage houses throughout the State were scrambling to address this issue immediately as many companies give out titles based upon agent's earnings as a reward as opposed to an implied authority and the companies needed to have a plan of action to address this change of understanding of Real Estate License Law.

Somehow the news got a hold of this Opinion Letter and now it is flying around at a rampant pace. So, what you should know is that your company can no longer permit you to utilize titles such as President, Vice President, Senior Vice President, Chairman, Vice Chairman, Managing Member, Director, Managing Director or anything else that is contained in the Business Corporation Law or Limited Liability Company Law as a term that implies authority. Instead, companies need to utilize titles without any correlated authority that does not exist.

Some articles flying around are:

The Real Deal - Brokers with false titles must now toe the line, regulators say
The Wall Street Journal - Titles Could Change for Some Real-Estate Brokers

Yet, there is no need to read the news, instead read the Opinion Letter for yourselves and understand why your companies are doing what they have to.

Mold Facts from Mold is Money

Thank you to all of our students who attended last week's continuing education course, Mold is Money.

At the class we were asked two (2) questions that we promised a blog follow-up so here goes:

1. Drywall has an overlay on both sides of the sheetrock to allow for taping and spackling, but remember to keep the treated side pointed toward the outside of the structure to avoid mold.

2. There are many different mold remediation certifying bodies and types of certifications out there.  Below are what we believe to be the top 3 certifications.

- American Council for Accredited Certifications (ACAC).  They have:

  - Certified Indoor Microbial Remediator (CMR)

  - Certified Indoor Environmentalist (CIE)  ( I have this cert.)

- Professional Mold Inspection Institute

  - Certified Residential Mold Inspector (CRMI)

  - Certified Commercial Mold Inspector (CCMI)

  - Certified Mold Remediator (CMR)

- Institute of Inspection Cleaning & Restoration Certification (IICRC)

  - Mold Removal Specialist (MRS)

If there are any other questions please feel free to contact our Mold Instructor, Scott Perry, CIE at (516)983-6841 or iaqtec@aol.com

Lieb at Law is Hiring a Real Estate Litigation Associate (May Law School Grads Should Apply)

Are you ambitious, meticulous and competitive? Do you thrive with technology and despise books and dictaphones? How does Hamptons living with NYC cases sound for your days? Lieb at Law is looking for a candidate who challenges the old-boys-club with hard-work, facts and confidence. We want someone who puts their money where their mouth is and will prove themselves first before asking for entitlements. If your writing is sometimes sloppy with typos, you need not apply. The firm is seeking the right attorney to join our collaborative team. Is that you?  

To Apply: Email cover letter, resume and legal writing sample to careers@liebatlaw.com

*no phone calls or faxes will be considered
*May 2013 Law School Grads Should Apply

www.liebatlaw.com

Lieb Featured in Dan's Papers

If you haven't already picked up a copy of today's Dan's Papers, check out page 78, Kelly Ann Krieger's article, "Let Expert Andrew Lieb Guide You".

http://danshamptons.com/article/ask-the-real-estate-expert/ask-the-real-estate-expert/let-expert-andrew-lieb-guide-you/

The Check's in the Mail: Settlements for Wrongful Foreclosures

Some information on foreclosure defendants receiving money in the mail, which is being shared by an Assistant Case Manager at Lieb at Law, P.C., Laura Palermo:     

Recently a few clients received a check from their current or former mortgage lender. Perplexed by this, my clients were a bit hesitant to run down to the bank to cash it. They asked “what is this for?” and “are there terms attached to this check I should know about?”

I directed them to a deal struckback in January of this year between Fannie Mae and the ten major banks to settle allegations that the banks had wrongfully foreclosed on thousands of homeowners between 2009 and 2010. The result of the deal was an $8.5 billion settlement which was to be allocated among the homeowners (or now former homeowners) who were wrongfully or prematurely foreclosed on or denied a loan modification resulting in foreclosure. The foreclosures which are considered as wrongful include those which were “robo-signed” or automatically entered into foreclosure proceedings without proper review for work out options such as modification, deed-in-lieu, or short sale.

The settlement amounts range anywhere from $100 to $125,000 per qualifying person. The settlement is thought to be disbursed among hundreds of thousands of people. There is no way in which to apply to be a part of the payout, the recipients of the settlement are to be determined by the banks. The settlement has been criticized by many for being too soft on the banks as it releases them from their responsibility for these foreclosures for a relatively low price.

The first wave of checks were mailed out this week, so if you fit the description of a person who was wrongfully foreclosed on or attempted to be foreclosed on between 2009 and 2010, and you find yourself with a check in hand from your former or current mortgage lender, go ahead and cash it, there are no special terms attached to it, it is simply your pay out from a billion dollar settlement you probably didn’t know you were a part of.

I’ll leave you off with some advice from my Grandma: “Don’t spend it all in one place!”

Mortgage Contingency Clauses - Deal Killers Follow-Up

Last evening, Lieb School came back to Newsday to start out 2013 lineup of courses. The first topic up was Deal Killers, which is my favorite course of all of our 15 licensed courses offered in our Course Catalog.

A large section of Deal Killers is devoted to not letting your deal die through understanding mortgage contingency clauses and how real estate agents should negotiate the shift of risk from the buyer to the seller when such a clause is added.

While discussing the topic last evening, we addressed a mortgage denial and explained the burdens of good faith and diligent efforts on a buyer. Next, we explained that even if  a buyer engages in some breach of the clause in bad faith, they may still prevail in cancelling the contract and having their down-payment returned if their breach is not the basis upon which the denial occurred.

To illustrate, I suggest our readers review the recent Appellate Division case of Ettienne v. Hochman where this precise scenario unfolded just this month. Therein the contract called for the buyer to apply for a "no-income-check mortgage", which the buyers failed to do and it seemed as if they were in breach. However, the Court looked to their basis of denial and found that "it would have been futile for them to additionally apply for a no-income-check mortgage" because they were denied based upon "their credit history" and not the type of mortgage applied for.

The takeaway for our readers is that while it matters that the buyer applies for precisely the mortgage called for in the contract of sale, a breach may not result in the buyer sacrificing his down-payment (assuming it is the liquidated damages for breach), if the buyer's failure to apply for the precise mortgage is unrelated to the basis for denial.

This case illustrates the exception to the rule where one would ordinarily have to follow the terms of the contract to the letter to be in compliance.

Last Chance To Enroll in Mold is Money - Free CE in Hauppauge on 4/24

Mold is Money (3 CE Credits)

April 24th, 2013 in Hauppauge

Remediation, your health and the law. Mr. Perry brings over 15 years of hands-on experience as a mold remediator and water investigation and restoration specialist, while Mr. Lieb offers both his background in public health and his legal expertise as we delve into this complex field from 3 angles; remediation, your health and the law. You will learn how to minimize your exposure to liability as a property manager and agent while maximizing your opportunity with mold infested properties in sales. This course will introduce you to spores like you have never seen them before, as a profit center for transactions and leases. Also, to be discussed is the leading case today on personal injuries caused by mold exposure, Cornell v. 360 West 51st Street Realty, LLC. Get ready to combine moisture with organic materials - its mold time. 

Instructors: Andrew M. Lieb, Esq., MPH and Scott Perry

Advanced Online Enrollment Required. 

Food & Refreshments provided by Citibank

Great NY Times Article - Why Home Prices Change (or Don't)

On Sunday, Robert J. Shiller wrote a must read article in the Times, Why Home Prices Change (or Dont').

Every type of real estate professional should understand the economics behind residential housing and this article objectively lays out the facts. Plus, if you don't know, Mr. Shiller's credentials include being a Professor of Economics at Yale - so pay attention to what he has to say.

The article looks at the economics of residential housing and compares this investment vehicle to stocks. Most importantly, it looks at last year's gains in housing and explains that its not a predictor for the next 10 years in growth and should only be viewed in terms of just being a growth for last year.

As the article states: "Over the 100 years ending in 1990- before the recent housing boom - real home prices rose only 0.2 percent a year, on average". Mr. Shiller explains that while it may psychologically feel like prices keep going up, one must look at prices after correcting for inflation. In such, there is not much growth in the long term.

So, real estate professionals, houses are a good buy if you want to live there. They may be good if you add money to the house through construction. Yet, if you want to buy, hold and not invest in a product, do not buy a house.

Rental Permit / Accessory Apartment Search Tool by the Town of Brookhaven

Brookhaven has added a great feature to its website called House Rental Search.

With this tool, the user can "see all of the active accessory apartment and house rental permit on the street you selected in the hamlet chosen". Remember, Villages control their own rental permits, so users in Villages must contact their Village.

This feature is going to make it completely transparent to tenants if the Town has permitted their rental. Remember, without a permit, a landlord cannot enforce a lease and is subject to many fines as well.

Now Brookhaven only needs to make getting a permit as easy as looking up if one exists. This way, safety can be the paramount concern over enforcement, which this tool will greatly increase.

Landlords and real estate agents - MAKE SURE YOU HAVE PERMITS. The Town has enabled tenants to really crackdown on your illegal rentals and be sure that they will.

Ability-to-Repay and Qualified Mortgage Guide Issued by CFPB

Today, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) issued a Small Entity Compliance Guide to the new Ability-to-Repay regulations, which are scheduled to commence effectiveness on January 10, 2014.

To remind our readers, the Ability-to-Repay regulations require loan originators to "make a reasonable, good-faith determination before or when [they] consummate a mortgage loan that the consumer has a reasonable ability to repay the loan, considering such factors as the consumer’s income or assets and employment status (if relied on) against:

• The mortgage loan payment
• Ongoing expenses related to the mortgage loan or the property that secures it, such as property taxes and insurance you require the consumer to buy
• Payments on simultaneous loans that are secured by the same property
• Other debt obligations, alimony, and child-support payments"

As stated within the Guide: "The purpose of this guide is to provide an easy-to-use summary of the ATR/QM rule."

Remember, ATR stands for Ability-to-Repay and QM stands for Qualified Mortgages.

So, real estate professionals, you should know that lenders will have to independently verify a borrower's Ability-to-Repay starting in January of next year and you should start now to become familiar with these new rules to effectively represent your clients. This Guide is a great starting place.

Upcoming 2013 New York Real Estate Expos and Conferences

Here is a list of some upcoming events in our area.

Lieb School is not currently involved as a sponsor or otherwise in any of these events beyond providing the list with links to our friends and students. Yet, we always encourage real estate professionals to learn and want to provide you with a resource of some places to get educated.

• April 11, 2013:  The “New Normal” for REIT M&A
• April 15 - 16, 2013:  RealShare Net Lease
• April 16, 2013:  New York City Development Finance Conference
• April 17, 2013:  CRE Investment Summit 2013
• April 19, 2013:   NY Retail Summit
• May 8, 2013:  Real Estate Mezzanine Financing Summit
• May 29-30, 2013:  US Real Estate Opportunity & Private Fund Investing Forum
• October 8, 2013:  NYC Real Estate Expo

                       

TITLE WAVES - Free CE on 4/30 (Nassau County) and 5/3 (NYC)

FREE Continuing Education

April 30th at First American in Uniondale 

& 

May 3rd at Chase Plaza in NYC. 

Sign Up Today at www.liebschool.com 

Freddie Mac Streamlined Modification

Some information on Freddie Mac's Streamlined Modification program by an Assistant Case Manager at Lieb at Law, P.C., Laura Palermo:     

           As of July 1, 2013 Freddie Mac is going to temporarily offer a new type of mortgage modification called a Streamlined Modification. The Streamlined Modification differs from the Standard Modification by way of the application process. Traditionally a delinquent mortgage holder (a.k.a. “borrower”) would have to endure a drawn-out review process which requires the borrower to submit a Borrower Response Packet which includes financial documentation and proof that they are/were experiencing a hardship. During this process the lender may request any and all documents which they feel is necessary for proof that the borrower encountered a hardship and now is able to afford a loan modification should one be granted. The modification application process can be daunting depending on the lender and the elements of the borrower’s situation.

            The Streamlined Modification does NOT require the borrower to submit a Borrower Response Packet; meaning that the lender no longer has to verify the borrower’s income or hardship.  Similar to the Standard Modification, if the borrower is eligible, the borrower will be required to successfully complete a trial period of at least three months prior to being offered a permanent modification, which will be subject to the same terms as defined for the Standard Modification.

            The eligibility requirements for the Streamlined Modification are as follows:

1.      Mortgage must be a first-lien which is owned, securitized, or guaranteed by Freddie Mac.

2.      The pre-modified mark-to-market loan-to-value (MTMLTV) ratio (gross unpaid principal balance of the current loan, including any principal forbearance as a result of a prior modification, divided by the property value) must be greater than or equal to 80 percent.

3.      Mortgage must be obtained at least 12 months prior to modification.

4.      Borrower must occupy the property as their primary residence

5.      Borrower must be at least 90, but not more than 720 days delinquent on their mortgage payment.

While this does sound like a great alternative to the Standard Modification it can be a risky move on Freddie Mac’s part. For example, the Streamlined Modification review guidelines (i.e. no verification of income necessary) are very similar to a previously common practice by lenders and servicers called a “blind modification”. The blind modifications granted borrowers with a refinance or modification without ever reviewing their finances. For some borrowers it worked wonderfully, while for others they could still not afford their payments and then would find themselves again in default with no further options for modification.

Despite the potential risk, I have high hopes for the Streamlined Modification program as it will present many delinquent borrowers with the opportunity to bring their mortgage current and out of delinquency without having to incur as many fees. Also, this may present many borrowers who are ineligible for Standard Modification due to their inability to prove hardship or verify their income to keep their homes.  For further information on the new program check out Freddie Mac’s news brief, click here. 

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau - Regulation Update Signup Available

At our course at Chase Plaza this past Friday, 4/5/13, on Mortgage Mania we referenced the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and its increasing function of regulating mortgages under the Conforming Loan Limit.

To receive the latest and greatest regulatory updates, each real estate professional should sign-up for email updates on their site, by clicking here.

The best way to add value to your clients is being in the know. So, sign-up NOW!!!

Mortgage Modifications - Supplemental Directive 13-02

On Friday, 4/5/13, Treasury issued new directives to the mortgage modification process.

To read the Supplemental Directive, click here.

Of note in this directive was a change in the categories for denial that give rise to a servicer's (lender's) inability to conduct a foreclosure sale following a denial. To clarify, a servicer cannot conduct a sale within 30 calendar days of a Non-Approval Notice to theoretically give the borrower an opportunity to correct their submission. The traditional five categories for Non-approval were:
(1) ineligible mortgage, (2) ineligible property, (3) offer not accepted by borrower/request withdrawn, (4) previously modified under HAMP Tier 2, and (5) borrower not a natural person.

However, what does ineligible mortgage or ineligible property really mean?

To clarify this confusion this directive deletes these categories and replaces them with the following clear reasons for denial of a modification:
(1) loan originated after January 1, 2009, not a first lien, or unpaid principal balance above program

limit, (2) loan paid off, or charged off and borrower released from liability for repayment, (3)
property condemned or more than four dwelling units, (4) loan subject to involuntary transfer to
a non-participant,

This change is another step in improving the Making Homes Affordable Program. By providing clearer understandings to borrowers and lenders for the framework to achieve a mortgage workout, the parties can intelligently negotiate a resolution.