LIEB BLOG

Legal Analysts

Saturday, January 19, 2019

Rental Real Estate Safe Harbor - Tax Law

On January 18, 2019, the IRS issued the safe harbor for rental real estate to be treated as a trade or business for purposes of IRC 199A's Qualified Business Income 20% deduction.

Real etate professionals, who operate "a rental real estate enterprise... [which is] an interest in real property held for the production of rents and may consist of an interest in multiple properties," should study the safe harbor closely as it can make a huge difference in your pocketbook. Interestingly, while multiple properties may qualify as the same enterprise, "[c]ommercial and residential real estate may not be part of the same enterprise."

According to the IRS, the safe harbor requires:

(A) Separate books and records are maintained to reflect income and expenses for each rental real estate enterprise;
(B) For taxable years beginning prior to January 1, 2023, 250 or more hours of rental services are performed (as described in this revenue procedure) per year with respect to the rental enterprise. For taxable years beginning after December 31, 2022, in any three of the five consecutive taxable
years that end with the taxable year (or in each year for an enterprise held for less than five years), 250 or more hours of rental services are performed (as described in this revenue procedure) per year with respect to the rental real estate enterprise; and
(C) The taxpayer maintains contemporaneous records, including time reports, logs, or similar documents, regarding the following: (i) hours of all services performed; (ii) description of all services performed; (iii) dates on which such services were performed; and (iv) who performed the services. Such records are to be made available for inspection at the request of the IRS. The contemporaneous records requirement will not apply to taxable years beginning prior to January 1, 2019

To claim the safe harbor, "include a statement attached to the return on which it claims the section 199A deduction or passes through section 199A information that the requirements in Section 3.03 of this revenue procedure have been satisfied."


Saturday, January 12, 2019

Risk and Penalties To Employers Who Fail To Provide Sexual Harassment Prevention Training in NY

Some employers want to know if they can chose to take the penalty and forego the NY required sexual harassment prevention training, policy and complaint form. Here is a cost benefit analysis explanation that you should read before making such a terrible decision.

The fines can be huge, although that isn't even the start of an explanation of the problems that an employer will face if they choose to forgo compliance with Labor Law 201-g (i.e., training their employees, providing a sexual harassment prevention policy, and offering a complaint form). Please understand that the penalties are applied per a provision of the law violated and not by an employer who violates, in general, as a single penalty. Therefore, each employee can represent at least 3 violations. The fines start at $100 per employee for the first violation and goes up from there (fines go up per number of violations such as not training, not providing a sexual harassment prevention policy and not supplying a complaint form with fines being compounded per employee).  So for a mid size company, fines can be in the tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars. We recommend taking a look at Labor Law 213 to understand further. When reading, you will learn that the real risk is that violating the Labor Law is chargeable with a misdemeanor and possible imprisonment. 

Beyond these surface Labor Law penalties, failure to train / have a policy / provide a complaint form will be catastrophic to an employer in defending a sex discrimination lawsuit because 2 important defenses will be lost, including:
  1. The Kolstad v. American Dental Association Affirmative Defense, which avoids punitive damages.
  1. The Burlington Industries Inc. v. Ellerth & Faragher v. City of Boca Raton Affirmative Defense, which avoids an employer being liable for a hostile work environment created by a supervisor if harassment doesn't result in a tangible employment action (e.g., denial of raise / promotion).
Beyond the loss of these defenses, it will be nearly impossible for any attorney, no matter how skilled, to defend a lawsuit where an employer willfully failed to comply with a law designed to prevent the very experience complained of by the victim in the first instance. Imagine the opening statements at a trial:

Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury, the defendants actively chose to forgo training their staff on sexual harassment prevention, as every other employer in this State is required to do, because they clearly want to maintain a chauvinistic workplace where women are treated as objects not equals. Today, we ask you to teach them a lesson. We ask you to teach all employers a lesson. Women matter. Women have rights. The workplace must be safe. The Labor Law insists that it is. We ask you to teach the defendants a lesson that violating the law is not a choice. New York State introduced Labor Law 201-g to prevent the very harassment that occurred to the Plaintiff. No, the defendants did not have a sexual harassment prevention policy to tell everyone what behavior was unacceptable in the workplace although they were required to have such a policy. No, the defendants did not have a sexual harassment prevention training to clarify what behavior was unacceptable in the workplace although they were required to have such a training. No, the defendants did not have a sexual harassment prevention complaint form to empower victims to protect themselves from unacceptable harassment occuring in the workplace although they were required to have such a complaint form. These defendants actively chose to violate the laws of this State and now they must answer. Some people only understand rules when they are forced to right a check. We ask you to teach them the rules. These defendants need to learn the rules about sexual harassment in the workplace. Sexual harassment will not be tolerated...   
To add insult to injury, it is anticipated that an employer with an EPLI policy in place to avoid this pain will learn quickly how easily coverage under such a policy can be disclaimed (i.e., no insurance defense or damages paid) for violating Labor Law 201-g. So, the employer will be stuck with paying exorbitant legal fees (i.e., these cases take a long time and are very fact intensive) and damages, without the very insurance policy, which they've been paying premiums on for years, in place. 
We are sure that you understand that this isn't the type of law that you can just do a cost / benefit analysis and decide to take the penalty. The risk is simply off the charts. In our opinion, if an employer defends a cognizable lawsuit without having complied with Labor Law 201-g, they may, very predictably, be going out of business. 


The trial will be painful for the employer to say the least. 


Wednesday, January 02, 2019

NYREJ: Year in Review 2018: Andrew Lieb, Lieb at Law, P.C.

Tuesday, January 01, 2019

Discrimination: Therapy Dogs in 2019

Game-changing developments are expected to occur in 2019 with respect to therapy dogs (i.e., service dogs and emotional support dogs) and real estate professionals must monitor these developments as they occur to stay on top of their game and avoid facing a lawsuit.

As some background, on April 18, 2018, Governor Cuomo signed S7319 into law. This statute charged "the commissioner of agriculture and markets shall convene a working group to examine the need for statewide standards for therapy dogs." Then, in October 2018, the working group published "A Report from the New York State Therapy Dog Working Group".

The Report is clear to note that "[therapy dogs are not defined in other laws under the Americans With Disabilities Act, Federal Housing Authority, NYS Human Rights Law, or New York City Human Rights Law" and that the current definition found at Article 7 of the Agriculture and Markets Law should be expanded to include "private homes" to its current definition of "any dog that is trained to aid the emotional and physical health of patients in hospitals, nursing homes, retirement homes and other settings and is actually used for such purpose, or any dog during the period such dog is being trained or bred for such purpose, and does not qualify under federal or state law or regulations as a service dog." As such, the definition would be relevant to suit under the New York State Human Rights Law (i.e., discrimination in housing) - Real Estate Brokers, Property Managers and Landlords take notice.

The Report calls for "standards regarding training, evaluation, certification, and identification of therapy dogs... especially in relation to service dogs and emotional support dogs." It is expected that further statutes will follow to enact the recommendations of the Report. It's important for real estate professionals to monitor these statutes as they go from bill to law rather than to learn about their rules from receiving a Summons and Complaint. Remember, the best real estate professionals are on the cutting-edge on changes to the law. Leveraging those changes makes you money. 


Thursday, December 27, 2018

Supreme Court Expands Reach of ADEA

In a decision dated Nov. 6, 2018, the United States Supreme Court broadened the scope of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) to cover state and local governments regardless of number of employees. Public employers must now be advised that they may be liable under the ADEA, regardless of number of employees, and face additional exposure for claims of age discrimination.

Read the full article by Mordy Yankovich, Esq. published in The Suffolk Lawyer here. 

Contracts of Sale: Preserving Rights is Transactional Counsel's Job

The dichotomy between a litigation and a transactional practice is stark. Simply, transactional counsel needs to adhere to the game of hot potato — don’t get stuck as the recipient of a notice when the music stops. Instead, counsel must assert a preservation right whenever counsel receives a notice that asserts contrary rights by the other party. Then, counsel should consult with litigation counsel to collaborate on how to best achieve the client’s goal through a hybrid of leveraging litigation and negotiating terms.

Click here to read the full article published in The Suffolk Lawyer. 

Tuesday, December 11, 2018

Anatomy of a Real Estate Lawsuit with Andrew M. Lieb

A lawsuit is not what you see on TV. On TV, a lawsuit is won by an attorney marching into court with a grand display of showmanship and a cunning tongue. The TV judge hearing the case makes a spot decision and it’s all over and decided before the final commercial break. In reality, a civil litigation takes years and is much more of a chess match than a swordfight. As opposed to this courtroom drama, a real case is typically decided on paper submissions that may be heard months after they are first provided to the court. Additionally, the decision is often made on a technical procedural rule, not on the merits or substance of the litigation.

You see, being right isn’t everything in real litigation. Instead, a real lawsuit is all about knowing how to play the game. The following is a summary of the stages of a litigation, but this chess match isn’t linear and each of the stages can appear out of order and can even reoccur again and again. So, civil litigants need a skilled advocate who is a master of the game if they want a shot at victory. Here is your game board:



Monday, December 10, 2018

Lieb at Law Seeks Junior Associate Attorney to join team

Lieb at Law, P.C., is seeking a junior associate attorney to support the firms widely expanding litigation and transactional practice. This role will work across the firms practice areas. Competence trumps experience and career growth is limited only by your own ability, ambition and desire to learn and evolve. We are looking for a potential star that is intellectually driven, who does not cut corners, has a fresh approach, thinks outside-the-box and can provide tangible fact-driven support. 

Desired qualifications:
  • Must love technology and use it always, must be comfortable in a paperless office with cloud based systems
  • Demonstrated proficiency in legal writing and oral advocacy;
  • Dedicated, organized and detail-orientated;
  • Ability to leverage substance rather than emotion;
  • Experience drafting contracts.
Practice Areas:
  • Transactions: Commercial and Residential Real Estate Purchase and Lease Transactions, Business Transactions and Negotiations.
  • Litigation: Commercial Litigation, Real Estate Litigation, Real Estate Brokerage Litigation, Title Litigation, Plaintiff Personal Injury, Landlord/Tenant, Estate Litigation and more.
  • Employment Litigation, Compliance and Trainings: Discrimination, Harassment, Retaliation, Wage and Hour, Restrictive Covenants, Family Medical Leave Act, Alternative Dispute Resolution, Appeals; Employee Handbooks and Policies, Sexual Harassment and Discrimination Training, Wage and Hour Audits & more.
  • Legal Compliance for Regulated Industries: Outside Compliance Counsel for regulated professions, Policy Drafting, Policy Implementation, Auditing, Corporate Compliance Trainings.
  • Estate Planning and Probate: Last Wills, Advance Directives, Trusts, and Probate Administration.
Qualifications:
Candidate must have 1 year of experience at a law firm.  Excellent critical thinking, writing, organization and research (Westlaw) skills.  Must be technologically savvy and detail oriented. 

Lieb at Law is different:
The law firm is a part-owner of a New York State Licensed Real Estate School, Lieb School, which offers in-class and digital courses throughout New York State and Connecticut. Lieb at Law, P.C. attorneys draft curriculum and teach at the school where they have the opportunity to establish themselves as topical experts and drive the future of the real estate brokerage industry. The law firm's sister firm, Lieb Compliance, leverages legal change to enhance business services. Lieb Compliance offers sexual harassment trainings and employment law support services. 

About the firm:
The firm was founded in 1977. In 2009, Andrew Lieb acquired control of the firm and transformed its legal services from a general practice to a commercial litigation boutique focusing on real estate and legal compliance for regulated industries.

The firm’s litigation practice is driven by leveraging informational imbalances to win cases. This is a substance first law firm where data drives decision making and strategy.

To achieve the firm’s information focused litigation culture, staff have access to cloud-based legal research platform so the latest cases are available to our legal team everywhere, including within the courtroom. Next, a secure, cloud-based case management system catalogs every thought and action on each client’s matter. As a result, case facts are readily accessible through the stroke of a computer key, instead of being locked away in one attorney’s memory or private paper notes in some desk draw. Finally, enterprise file sharing, storage and collaboration software is utilized to enable the efficient collaboration between attorneys where case strategy and document preparation benefits from fresh and innovative group think.

Lieb at Law’s latest research and collaboration tools extend to the firm’s transactional team, which ensures that contractual language is driven by our real life experiential learning from our contractual litigating practice.

Lastly, we publish and teach the law that we practice in order to always stay on the cutting edge. Lieb at Law’s work product is a derivative of embracing education and technology to provide a modern law firm that is at the vanguard of representation.

-

To Apply email resume and cover letter to careers@liebatlaw.com


Wednesday, December 05, 2018

Everything you need to know about NY Mandatory Sexual Harassment Prevention Trainings & Policies

Every NYS employer must provide their employees with both an annual sexual harassment prevention training and policy pursuant to Labor Law section 201-g. It is a misdemeanor for Employers to violate the Labor Law and likely will trigger an EPLI insurance provider to disclaim coverage in a prospective sex discrimination lawsuit.

Highlights:
  • Sexual Harassment Policies: All employers must adopt and provide a sexual harassment prevention policy to all employees by 10/9/18. If your company already has a sexual harassment policy, make sure that it meets or exceeds the newly required minimum standards.
  • All Employees Must Be Trained: Between 10/9/18 and 10/9/19 all employees must be trained and annually thereafter on each employee's anniversary, start date or date selected by employer.
  • New Employees Must Be Trained and Provided Policies ImmediatelyEmployers are liable for the actions of employees immediately upon hire, the State encourages training as soon as possible.
  • NYC Independent Contractors: The NYC Commission on Human Rights requires employers with 15 or more employees (which includes independent contractors) to provide training to all independent contractors who have performed work for the employer for more than 90 days or 80 hours in a calendar year.
  • Policy and Training For Independent Contractors: The State Human Rights Law imposes liability on the employer for their actions and encourages employers to provide the policy and training to anyone providing services in the workplace including contractors, subcontractors, vendors and consultants.
Why Employers Should Not Use NYS Sample Policy:
  1. It does not address every other protected class under which an employer can be sued for discrimination (e.g., race, religion, color, national origin, sex [including pregnancy], military status, age, marital status, sexual orientation, gender expression or identity, genetic information, disability or any other personal characteristics considered to be a protected class under applicable federal, state or local laws). Updating the policy matters because when sued for discrimination by a different protected class, you will be able to explain that everyone is protected in the workplace.
  2. It does not list potential remedial measures (e.g., termination, suspension, probation, demotion, reassignment, etc.). Updating the policy matters because employees who do not know the consequences are unlikely to care about changing behavior and, more importantly, without clear expectations an employer can be sued for arbitrarily applying their policy in a discriminatory manner.
  3. It does not cause an employee to agree to its terms and to acknowledge written receipt of the policy and complaint form, which is required by law. Updating the policy matters because without records you have nothing when faced with a Department of Labor audit or a prospective lawsuit. More so, you can justify termination for cause when an employee violates your policy, which they affirmatively agreed to follow.
Why Employers Should Not Use NYS Sample Training Videos:
  • NYS has released videos to comply with the NYS required sexual harassment training under Labor Law 201-g. However, the website for the videos expressly advises that they are non-compliant.  "the videos alone are NOT considered interactive. If you are using this video to meet the training requirements, you must also: ask questions of employees as part of the program; accommodate questions asked by employees, with answers provided in a timely manner; or require feedback from employees about the training and the materials presented."
What To Look For In A Sexual Harassment Training Vendor:
  • A system to track that employees took the training in anticipation of a Department of Labor audit;
  • A system to track that the sexual harassment policy and complaint form were distributed in writing and agreed to be followed (i.e., clickwrap) by the employee - distribution of these documents is also required;
  • A branded policy and training, with both addressing all types of discrimination, beyond just sexual harassment, because the employer may face a discrimination suit on a different protected class and wouldn't want to have to explain to a jury why they only cared about sex discrimination, not the applicable protected class (e.g., race, marital status, disability, etc.); and
  • Most importantly, a digital on-demand product because the training needs to be instantly available to new employees (i.e., NYS requires trainings as soon as possible from start date and NYC requires trainings within 90 days of start date)
Why Lieb Compliance Is Your Solution: 
Lieb Compliance offers a solution that not only complies with all of the updated regulations but also helps defend prospective litigation.
  • Complies with both Labor Law 201-g and Local Law 96 (NYS / NYC requirements for sexual harassment prevention) 
  • Our platform is an interactive video that employees can take at their convenience with a high speed Internet connection. The platform includes a branded sexual harassment prevention policy and complaint form that requires employees to download and review the form
  • Our competitors rarely offer an opportunity for employers to require that their employees affirmatively agree to be bound by their policy through a digital clickwrap receipt 
  • Our content and instructor, Andrew Lieb, who teaches through case studies and practical advice, not theory. Mr. Lieb, Esq is an employment law litigator and is regarded as one of the best legal educators in the country who can make a boring required topic, like sexual harassment prevention, come to life through humor and fun. That is why our trainings have continuously received rave reviews from C-suite executives, who frequently tell us that our trainings have transformed employee compliance into a morale building experience. Simply, employees thank their bosses for hiring Lieb Compliance
To learn more, check out our demo and you will be sold.



Monday, December 03, 2018

Lieb at Law is Hiring a Real Estate Paralegal

Lieb at Law, P.C. seeks digitally savvy, detail oriented and motivated paralegal. The firm services the New York Metro area, inclusive of the Hamptons and Manhattan and represents sellers, buyers and lenders in residential and commercial real estate closings. 

The firm is a paperless office with a focus on technology and substance. Must be friendly, charismatic and organized. We will grow your career and teach you how to reach the next level.


The firm’s sister company is one of the largest real estate schools in the state offering in-person and digital continuing education classes to real estate brokers and salespersons.
Responsibilities:
  • Drafting and reviewing contracts of sale
  • Ordering and clearing title
  • Coordinating with brokers, surveyors, expeditors, lenders and other client-vendors
  • Managing client needs
  • Coordinating closings
  • Maintaining files as always up-to-date through use of case management technology
  • New business intake – opening and closing files and tracking / closing potential cases
  • Preparing closing statements
  • Answering telephones, distributing mail and deliveries, announcing visitors, maintaining office appearance, watering plants, making coffee, and generally helping throughout entire law firm
  • Managing closing department calendar
Requirements:
  • Must love technology and use it always
  • Need to love sales – be charismatic / friendly / hungry
  • Required to be self-sufficient and take pride in your work-product
  • Success requires a detail-oriented / organized / multi-tasker
  • Proficient in Microsoft Word, Excel, and Google Calendar
  • Active presence on Social Media
  • Minimum of typing 60+ words per minute
  • Minimum Associates Degree from accredited college. Bachelor’s Degree preferred
  • Cannot be a practicing real estate salesperson / associate broker due to conflicts
Email Resumes to Careers@liebatlaw.com