The Closing Disclosure Replaces the HUD-1 in Real Estate Transactions in 2015

According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the new form, "The Closing Disclosure form replaces the current form used to close a loan, the HUD-1, which was designed by HUD under RESPA. It also replaces the revised Truth in Lending disclosure designed by the Board under TILA."

Consumers must receive this form "at least three business days before the consumer closes on the loan." Strikingly, if many possible loan components are changed following the provision of The Closing Disclosure form, such as changing the product or adding a prepayment penalty, a "consumer must be provided a new form and an additional three-business-day waiting period after receipt".

Look forward to this final rule, which is effective on August 1, 2015.

Ringing in the New Year With Real Estate Brokerage Advertising Regulations

If you've been following our blog, you've known for months about the Real Estate Brokerage Advertising Regulations which became effective on January 2, 2014. Hopefully you have been preparing to ensure compliance, but if you haven't, here's one last reminder that you most likely need to overhaul the way you advertise.

The Department of State has overhauled the Advertising Regulations found in 22 NYCRR 175.25. If you've visited their page before, make sure you refresh your browser to see the updated January 2014 regulations. What used to be two paragraphs has exploded into twenty-eight paragraphs over two pages covering everything from for-sale signs to e-mail correspondences. Even the simplest things fall under the new regulations. For example, salespersons and brokers must display their full licensed names on their advertisements, no nicknames, and phone numbers must be clearly labeled based upon their type (cell, desk, home, etc). By defining advertising as "promotion and solicitation related to licensed real estate activity" the Department of State has thrown a broad net in order to capture as much activity as possible under the new regulations.

It is imperative that brokers become familiar with the new regulations so they understand what they need to change, and it is even more important that brokers conduct trainings with their agents who most likely are unknowingly violating the new regulations on a regular basis. Determining what information is required on each type of advertisement requires a careful reading of the regulations. Consult your trusted attorney for guidance so you can avoid potential penalties and continuing running your brokerage without a hiccup.

Ocwen is Finally Accountable for its Actions

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and 49 states have signed a proposed court order requiring Ocwen to spend $2.1 billion on loan modification programs and relief to victims of foreclosure. 

Ocwen is the largest non-bank mortgage servicer in the United States. It was alleged by CFPB that for years, Ocwen has illegally delayed loan modifications, charged improper fees, provided incorrect updates to consumers who were applying for loan modifications, erroneously reviewed foreclosure documents, and inaccurately applied and tracked monthly mortgage payments. 

Like GMAC, Bank of America, Citi, JPMorgan Chase, and Wells Fargo, Ocwen is alleged to have deceived and abused the system for too long and must be punished for its illegal practices.

Under the Order, Ocwen is required to comply with the provisions of the 2012 National Mortgage Settlement and must comply with the new mortgage servicing rules that are taking effect January 2014. A knowledgeable, responsive single point of contact must be established for borrowers applying for relief, so that the loan modification process will be clearer and quicker than ever before. Instead of being sacrificed, borrowers will now be protected and given a fair shot at saving their homes.

Borrowers should be overjoyed that there will be more communication between servicer and borrower, and that borrowers who were improperly foreclosed on between 2009 and 2012 may receive compensation. It is a great step forward in the mortgage servicing world. 

Thank you to Lieb at Law's Assistant Case Manager, Jessica Vogele, for sharing this valuable information. 

Andrew M. Lieb reappointed as Special Section Editor for Real Property to The Suffolk Lawyer

We would like to congratulate our Managing Attorney, Andrew M. Lieb, on having been re-appointed as the Special Section Editor for Real Property to The Suffolk Lawyer, law journal.

Andrew M. Lieb reappointed as Co-Chair of the Real Property Committee to the Suffolk County Bar Association

We would like to congratulate our Managing Attorney, Andrew M. Lieb, on having been re-appointed as the Co-Chair of the Real Property Committee to the Suffolk County Bar Association for the 2013 - 2014 term.

Welcome to the World - Spencer Nate Lieb

Lauren and Andrew Lieb are thrilled to introduce their son, Spencer Nate Lieb.

Born December 7th, 2013

Weighing 6 Pounds 14 Ounces

Measuring 20 Inches

Mortgage Changes less than a Month Away – What to expect on January 10, 2014

A whole new world of getting a mortgage is coming in the beginning of 2014. You should get familiar now!!!

To remind you, in the years before 2008, financial institutions were subject to little regulation in the United States. Many lenders did not even bother to verify income or debt before handing over adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs) to consumers who could not afford them. High risk lending was the norm and mortgage fraud was rampant. These practices caused the subprime mortgage crisis and the worst recession that the country has experienced since the 1930s. Thousands of homes were foreclosed on and over one hundred mortgage lenders went bankrupt as more and more people could no longer afford their monthly mortgage payments.

As a result, The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is issuing a final rule that prohibits high risk lending and implements the Truth in Lending Act and sections 1411, 1412, and 1414 of the Dodd-Frank Act. This rule will take effect on January 10, 2014, and will require mortgage lenders to verify consumers’ income and debt. Prepayment penalties that punish borrowers if they sell or refinance their home within a certain time frame are now generally prohibited. Qualified mortgages, which are less likely to end up in default, are defined in great detail and cannot have terms longer than 30 years or fees exceeding 3% of the total loan amount.  Lender are also encouraged to refinance adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs) and must maintain documentation of compliance for three years after the loan is given to the consumer.

To remain in the real estate game, you must understand these rules and what a qualified mortgage is as that will drive the industry. Please read the rule for yourself!

Will We See an Extension of the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act through 2014?

The Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007 has provided relief to thousands of borrowers who have completed short sales or obtained loan modifications with mortgage principal reductions. Before this law was enacted, any forgiven mortgage debt was taxable by the government. For example, if a lender reduced a borrower’s principal balance by $100,000.00, then the borrower would have to report that forgiven debt as ordinary income and pay taxes on it.  This was, of course, impractical and unreasonable for borrowers who were already experiencing financial hardship and were relying on modifications or short sales to save them from foreclosure. Most borrowers could not afford their tax bills and were stuck in the same situation as they were in before they had requested help from their lenders.

Under The Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007, borrowers do not have to pay taxes on cancelled mortgage debt as a result of a modification or foreclosure of their primary residence. This act was originally supposed to end at the end of 2012, but it was granted an extension through 2013 on the third day of the new year.

An extension may be granted through 2014, but it is unlikely. Both H.R. 2788 and H.R. 2994 are bills that will extend The Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act for at least another year, but they were each referred to committee over the summer and have received no attention since. There are 44 cosponsors for H.R. 2994, but it is already now the middle of December and time is running out. In order for this bill to be enacted, it still needs to pass the House and Senate and it must get signed by the President before December 31, 2013. It is improbable that an extension will be granted, but not impossible; especially with the economy rebounding and many forgetting the plight of those left behind. It’s important to not forget these individuals that still need relief and who have often spent years trying to get a modification or a short sale approved only to now be taxed when they finally get the relief that they have hoped for.

So for them, please tell your local representative how important it is that these Bills are passed and The Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007 is extended for another year.

Thank you to Lieb at Law's Assistant Case Manager, Jessica Vogele, for sharing this valuable information. 

Hotel Occupancy Tax on Expedia, are brokers next to be taxed for their rentals?

Last week, the Court of Appeals, NY's highest court, ruled that "Local Law 43, a hotel room occupancy tax applicable to online travel companies", is constitutional.

At issue before the Court was the legality of the City's "authority to tax the fees they collect from their customers" in Expedia v. City of NY Dept. of Finance where this fee represents an amount, which is larger than the amount actually paid the hotel for the actual occupancy of the room.

So the question before the Court was whether the brokerage fee, on hotel occupancy, was taxable? 

This decision is most interesting to real estate professionals because they always wonder why there are rules for transient (short-term) rentals of housing. As they can see from this decision, there are rules for establishments that offer transient housing such as hotels, motels & inns in the form of the imposition of a tax, among other rules. Further there are rules for companies that "broker" those deals whereas those "brokers" have to pay a tax on their commission, among other rules. Aren’t these websites, called “room remarketers” in the applicable tax, analogous to real estate brokerage companies for landlord / tenant rentals that aren’t transient? At the least, aren’t they analogous to Airbnb in the transient setting?

In opposition, the online travel companies argued that the City was taxing “a service fee under the guise of a tax on hotel rent” and therefore the tax was improper. The Court explained that the online travel companies were incorrect. The Court stated: “[u]nder the statute, the City may tax a ‘rent or charge,’ and it may collect the tax from a hotel ‘owner . . . or . . . person entitled to be paid the rent or charge’".  Further, “the City may tax any service fee that is a ‘condition of occupancy.’”

Aren’t brokerage fees on landlord / tenant a condition of occupancy? Maybe, but maybe not. Doesn’t a condition mean that its failure prevents the result? Can a broker prevent the result? No, therein is the difference between brokerage companies and travel sites. Real estate brokers often are cut out of deals and cannot prevent occupancy in order to get paid, but instead have a claim for commission that is separate from occupancy. In fact, no Lis Pendens is available to brokers and a mechanic’s lien is only available for a lease with a term of more than 3 years for non-residential property.

However, doesn’t Airbnb do just the same as Expedia? So, will companies like Expedia try to level the playing field next by lobbying that this tax is imposed on Airbnb as well? Right now, the cost of doing business for Airbnb just got cheaper and they now have a strategic financial advantage in the City of New York. What happens next is tantalizing.  

Movements in LGBT Discrimination Laws

In the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court's June 26 same-sex marriage decisions, pressure has increased to expand protections under federal, state and local legislation regarding sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression in the context of employment and housing. In the employment area, the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions ("HELP") Committee has approved a bill, ENDA (the Employment Non-Discrimination Act), that would prohibit employers from discriminating against employees on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity.

Learn more about employment and housing regulations and see the full published article here