The Department
of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is proposing a
ban on smoking in public housing units nationwide to protect residents from
the dangers of secondhand smoke. Citing to the higher risks of cancer and other
diseases associated with secondhand smoking, HUD
Secretary Julian Castro stated that this policy would protect millions of
Americans from preventable diseases every year. Additionally, it would save
public housing agencies millions of dollars in repairs from fire and smoke
damage caused by lit tobacco products.
The “castle
doctrine” is a long-standing legal doctrine allowing individuals certain
protections in his or own home. However, if HUD’s proposed ban is enacted,
public housing will no longer be a castle for those residents who want to smoke
in the privacy of their own homes. By conducting public health studies and
hearing public comments, HUD is within its rights to create such a ban.
Many public housing agencies across the country have already
implemented anti-smoking policies due to the HUD’s vigorous campaign to adopt
such policies since 2009. However, this proposed ban would require all public housing agencies to conform
to a non-smoking policy in not only the residences but also the indoor common
areas, administrative offices, and within 25 feet outdoors of these units.
It is unclear how the rule will be enforced and what kinds
of accommodations will be offered to smokers who already reside in these public
housing units. Though the act of smoking lit tobacco products does not fall
under a protected class, this policy may have a disparate impact on elderly and
disabled smokers who cannot easily leave their homes every time they want a
cigarette. If the elderly and disabled are unable to conform to the rule, they
be forced out of their residences without any other place to go.
Secondhand smoke is a public health issue, but HUD must
tread lightly to offer reasonable accommodations to those who already reside in
public housing and who may not be able to abide by the new rule. Otherwise, HUD may face a flood of
discrimination lawsuits.