The Plight of the Broker

Many look with envy at the good fortune of the broker, who reaps a large pot from simply introducing the parties to the deal, but to those who do not live in his shoes, think this:

"[A] broker is never entitled to commissions for unsuccessful efforts.

The risk of failure is wholly his.

The reward comes only with his success.

That is the plain contract and contemplation of the parties.

The broker may devote his time and labor, and expend his money with ever so much of devotion to the interests of his employer, and yet if he fails, if without effecting an agreement or accomplishing a bargain, he abandons the effort, or his authority is fairly and in good faith terminated, he gains no right to commissions.

He loses the labor and effort which was staked upon success.

And in such event it matters not that after his failure, and the termination of his agency, what he has done proves of use and benefit to the principal.

In a multitude of cases that must necessarily result.

He may have introduced to each other parties who otherwise would have never met; he may have created impressions which, under later and more favorable circumstances, naturally lead to and materially assist in the consummation of a sale; he may have planted the very seeds from which others reap the harvest; but all that gives him no claim.

It was part of his risk that failing himself, not successful in fulfilling his obligation, others might be left to some extent to avail themselves of the fruit of his labors."

This is the life of a broker as articulated by NY's Highest Court in the case of Sibbald v. Bethlehem Iron Co. in 1881, which remains true to this day. A broker deserves everything he gets as he must live in an all or nothing world. Here is to the broker who makes the deals happen!

Supplemental Directive 13-09 to Take Effect in Two Days

The time has come! Supplemental Directive 13-09 to the Making Homes Affordable handbook will take effect in two days on January 10, 2014.

As discussed in a previous entry, this Supplemental Directive makes the loss mitigation process easier, clearer, and more efficient. It is an alignment with the final Consumer Finance Protection Bureau (CNPB) Mortgage Servicing Regulations, which prohibit high risk lending and will also take effect on January 10, 2014. 

Servicers must review documents and submit Incomplete Information Notices in tighter timeframes than ever before. This makes sense because most borrowers submit incomplete initial packets anyway and should be advised of missing documents immediately to move forward from the initial stage. By contacting the borrowers earlier and responding to them quicker, servicers are now able to maximize borrower protection in their review of loan modification applications.

The Department of the Treasury and the Department of Housing and Urban Development did not want to completely overhaul the Making Homes Affordable guidebook because they did not want to alter or destroy the integrity of the programs. All changes to the Making Homes Affordable handbook were kept to a minimum and in accordance with the final CFPB Mortgage Servicing Regulations. Remember, the CFPB regulations are the bare bones of requirements for servicers, so when servicers review borrowers for HAMP, they still must consider the Making Homes Affordable handbook and state laws as well.  

Also, HAMP still remains top priority even though CFPB regulations require borrowers to be considered for all loss mitigation options at the same time. If the servicer participates in the HAMP program and the borrower is eligible for HAMP, the borrower must be given HAMP over other in-house loan modifications. 

The Closing Disclosure Replaces the HUD-1 in Real Estate Transactions in 2015

According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the new form, "The Closing Disclosure form replaces the current form used to close a loan, the HUD-1, which was designed by HUD under RESPA. It also replaces the revised Truth in Lending disclosure designed by the Board under TILA."

Consumers must receive this form "at least three business days before the consumer closes on the loan." Strikingly, if many possible loan components are changed following the provision of The Closing Disclosure form, such as changing the product or adding a prepayment penalty, a "consumer must be provided a new form and an additional three-business-day waiting period after receipt".

Look forward to this final rule, which is effective on August 1, 2015.

Ringing in the New Year With Real Estate Brokerage Advertising Regulations

If you've been following our blog, you've known for months about the Real Estate Brokerage Advertising Regulations which became effective on January 2, 2014. Hopefully you have been preparing to ensure compliance, but if you haven't, here's one last reminder that you most likely need to overhaul the way you advertise.

The Department of State has overhauled the Advertising Regulations found in 22 NYCRR 175.25. If you've visited their page before, make sure you refresh your browser to see the updated January 2014 regulations. What used to be two paragraphs has exploded into twenty-eight paragraphs over two pages covering everything from for-sale signs to e-mail correspondences. Even the simplest things fall under the new regulations. For example, salespersons and brokers must display their full licensed names on their advertisements, no nicknames, and phone numbers must be clearly labeled based upon their type (cell, desk, home, etc). By defining advertising as "promotion and solicitation related to licensed real estate activity" the Department of State has thrown a broad net in order to capture as much activity as possible under the new regulations.

It is imperative that brokers become familiar with the new regulations so they understand what they need to change, and it is even more important that brokers conduct trainings with their agents who most likely are unknowingly violating the new regulations on a regular basis. Determining what information is required on each type of advertisement requires a careful reading of the regulations. Consult your trusted attorney for guidance so you can avoid potential penalties and continuing running your brokerage without a hiccup.

Ocwen is Finally Accountable for its Actions

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and 49 states have signed a proposed court order requiring Ocwen to spend $2.1 billion on loan modification programs and relief to victims of foreclosure. 

Ocwen is the largest non-bank mortgage servicer in the United States. It was alleged by CFPB that for years, Ocwen has illegally delayed loan modifications, charged improper fees, provided incorrect updates to consumers who were applying for loan modifications, erroneously reviewed foreclosure documents, and inaccurately applied and tracked monthly mortgage payments. 

Like GMAC, Bank of America, Citi, JPMorgan Chase, and Wells Fargo, Ocwen is alleged to have deceived and abused the system for too long and must be punished for its illegal practices.

Under the Order, Ocwen is required to comply with the provisions of the 2012 National Mortgage Settlement and must comply with the new mortgage servicing rules that are taking effect January 2014. A knowledgeable, responsive single point of contact must be established for borrowers applying for relief, so that the loan modification process will be clearer and quicker than ever before. Instead of being sacrificed, borrowers will now be protected and given a fair shot at saving their homes.

Borrowers should be overjoyed that there will be more communication between servicer and borrower, and that borrowers who were improperly foreclosed on between 2009 and 2012 may receive compensation. It is a great step forward in the mortgage servicing world. 

Thank you to Lieb at Law's Assistant Case Manager, Jessica Vogele, for sharing this valuable information. 

Andrew M. Lieb reappointed as Special Section Editor for Real Property to The Suffolk Lawyer

We would like to congratulate our Managing Attorney, Andrew M. Lieb, on having been re-appointed as the Special Section Editor for Real Property to The Suffolk Lawyer, law journal.